← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 14
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Single-turn · Task 14 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"e83ea8e208903b54-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "345.85"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.06", "cap": "5000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "2800.00", "middle_rate": "0.12", "upper_rate": "0.18"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.08", "cap": "4500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "900.00", "upper": "3600.00", "middle_rate": "0.10", "upper_rate": "0.22"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 6.1s · $0.0006
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not include gross_pay. Please provide gross_pay so the monthly payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process record. It lacks gross_pay. But there is authoritative case reference schedule. Source documents payroll record only payroll_month, allowed_deduction. No gross_pay. R7 order: Missing gross_pay: clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 R7. Need include decision, reason_code, clauses, optional explanation. Ensure no calculated monetary fields. Need exactly required answer fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. They ask Return R6 or R7 JSON answer. We can include explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. Need no Markdown fences. Need be careful: contract_gross_pay absent, amendment absent. Missing gross_pay explicit. So decision clarify. Clauses? R7 says citing R1 and R7. Include ["R1","R7"]. Explanation: gross_pay is missing; provide it to calculate. Could mention no payslip. Money strings? Not applicable. JSON object only. Need no input-only fields such as payroll_month? Clarify fields do not include. Explanation can mention? "The record does not include gross_pay, so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide gross_pay." That's okay. Final.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 3.6s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not include gross_pay. Provide the employee's gross_pay for payroll_month 2026-01 to calculate payroll."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process record. Missing gross_pay. Source payroll record has payroll_month 2026-01, allowed_deduction 345.85, no gross_pay. R7 order: Missing gross_pay -> clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Need JSON fields decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. Must not include calculated monetary fields. Need exactly required answer fields? For clarify uses decision, reason_code, clauses. Include explanation maybe. Need no markdown. Ensure clauses identifiers. Reason: missing gross_pay. But note R4 says when month or applicable row absent accept structurally valid deductions up to 350.00. Here month present and schedule exists. But missing gross_pay first. So clarify. Need cite R1 and R7. Could include explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. "Missing gross_pay; provide gross_pay." JSON. Need ensure no extra fields? Allowed clarify uses decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation string permitted. So include explanation. Money not needed. final.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 13.9s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not include gross_pay, so payroll cannot be calculated. Provide the missing gross_pay to resolve."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process record. Source documents payroll record has payroll_month 2026-01, allowed_deduction 345.85. Missing gross_pay. Check R7 order: missing gross_pay first. Return clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Need include decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation. No calculated fields. Ensure JSON object no markdown. Need maybe mention unresolved blocker. Also note authoritative schedule exists but missing gross_pay. Need not calculate. Use exact fields. Money? none.
Final: {"decision":"clarify","reason_code":"MISSING_GROSS_PAY","clauses":["R1","R7"],"explanation":"The payroll record does not include gross_pay, so payroll cannot be calculated. Provide the missing gross_pay to resolve."} Ensure only clauses directly govern answer. R1 and R7. Good.