← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 44
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Single-turn · Task 44 (Traps, month not covered)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"93c6cd218be71e1f-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "2246.04", "payroll_month": "2025-07", "allowed_deduction": "103.13"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3600.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.18"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.08", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "2800.00", "middle_rate": "0.12", "upper_rate": "0.24"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 11.8s · $0.0012
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-07 is outside the covered 2026 reference periods, so no applicable reference row exists. Please provide a payroll month covered by the reference schedule (2026-01 through 2026-12)."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Payroll month 2025-07. Rules only 2026 covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Month without reference row -> NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Need cite R1 and R7. Do not calculate monetary fields. Need decision clarify, reason_code, clauses, optional explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. Need exactly required fields? Allowed clarify uses decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. We can include explanation. Need no Markdown. Ensure JSON object. Mention month 2025-07 outside covered 2026 and no applicable reference row. Ask provide month in 2026? Let's craft. Need maybe check order: missing gross? no. missing payroll_month? no. month without reference row: yes. Return clarify reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE citing R1 and R7. Since authoritative schedule rows first-half/second-half only for 2026? The schedule period boundaries stay same. 2025-07 no row. No calculation. Final JSON.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 5.0s · $0.0011
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Payroll month 2025-07 is outside the covered 2026 reference periods, so no applicable reference row can be selected. Provide a 2026 payroll month or confirm an applicable reference schedule."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Payroll month 2025-07. Rules only 2026 covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Missing? gross_pay present, payroll_month present. Month without reference row? 2025-07 outside 2026, no applicable reference. R7 step 3: month without reference row return clarify reason NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE citing R1 and R7. Also R9 says missing or out-of-range dates cite R1 and R7. Need include decision clarify, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. Allowed fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. Need no calculated monetary fields. JSON object no markdown. Ensure clauses array? The schema? "clauses" likely array of strings. Need exactly required answer fields and only clauses that directly govern. For clarify include decision reason_code clauses. Maybe explanation. Use clauses ["R1","R7"]. The reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Explanation: payroll_month 2025-07 is outside covered 2026, no applicable reference row; provide month within 2026 or confirm applicable schedule. But schedule has first-half/second-half boundaries same? It says only 2026 covered. Case schedule doesn't extend coverage. So clarify. Need output JSON.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2.6s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Payroll month 2025-07 is outside the covered 2026 reference periods, so no applicable reference row exists. Please provide a payroll month covered by a reference row."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Payroll month 2025-07. Rule R1 only 2026 covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Month without reference row -> NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE citing R1 and R7. Also schedule only first/second half 2026? It says authoritative schedule for first-half/second-half, meanings and period boundaries stay same. 2025-07 outside 2026 no applicable reference. Need decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation short naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. Allowed fields clarify decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation. Return JSON object no markdown. Ensure no monetary fields. Need maybe mention payroll month 2025-07 outside covered 2026. Final.