← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 61
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Single-turn · Task 61 (Traps, conflicting pay (draft amendment))
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R7 R9 | R7 R9 | R7 R9 | R7 R9 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"c0185566d458c0d5-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "5319.10", "payroll_month": "2026-04", "allowed_deduction": "207.83"}}, "c0185566d458c0d5-contract": {"kind": "contract", "gross_pay": "5419.10"}, "c0185566d458c0d5-amendment": {"kind": "amendment", "gross_pay": "5319.10", "effective_month": "2026-04", "approved": false}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "5000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1000.00", "upper": "2800.00", "middle_rate": "0.08", "upper_rate": "0.24"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "4500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1000.00", "upper": "3300.00", "middle_rate": "0.12", "upper_rate": "0.18"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 7.7s · $0.0013
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The payroll gross_pay (5319.10) conflicts with the contract gross_pay (5419.10), and the amendment is not approved, so it cannot resolve the conflict. Please provide an approved amendment matching the payroll gross_pay or otherwise resolve the gross pay conflict."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Need be careful. We have payroll record gross_pay 5319.10, payroll_month 2026-04, allowed_deduction 207.83. Contract gross_pay 5419.10 differs. Amendment: gross_pay 5319.10, effective_month 2026-04, approved false. R7 order: missing gross? no. missing month? no. month without reference? 2026-04 covered first-half. R7 step4 optional contract_gross_pay present and differs from gross_pay, neither source takes precedence unless approved amendment resolves under R9. Otherwise clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY citing R7/R9. Amendment is not approved, so does not resolve. Therefore decision clarify reason_code CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R7,R9. No monetary fields. Include explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. Need JSON object exactly required fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. Need no markdown. Ensure clauses array? likely. Use JSON. Need maybe cite R7 and R9 only. Explanation short naming unresolved blocker: contract gross_pay differs and amendment unapproved. Ask for approved amendment or corrected contract? We can include. Final.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4.0s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The payroll gross_pay (5319.10) conflicts with contract_gross_pay (5419.10), and the amendment is not approved, so it does not resolve the conflict. Please provide an approved amendment or otherwise resolve the gross pay conflict."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Need follow rules. Let's parse. Payroll record: gross_pay 5319.10, payroll_month 2026-04, allowed_deduction 207.83. Contract gross_pay 5419.10 differs. Amendment gross_pay 5319.10, effective_month 2026-04, approved false. R7 order: missing gross no, missing month no, month row yes (2026-04 first-half). Optional contract present differs from gross_pay. Neither source takes precedence unless approved amendment resolves under R9. Amendment approved false, so does not resolve. Therefore return clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY citing R7 and R9. Do not return calculated monetary fields. Need JSON with decision, reason_code, clauses, optional explanation. Allowed clarify fields: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. Need no markdown. Need exactly required answer fields and only clauses that directly govern. Explanation short naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. We can include explanation string. Need ensure money strings? Clarify no monetary. Clauses ["R7","R9"]. Maybe mention contract conflict, amendment not approved. Need not include R1? R7 says unresolved contract conflicts cite R7 and R9. So clauses R7,R9. Reason code CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY. Final JSON.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3.6s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The payroll gross_pay (5319.10) conflicts with the contract gross_pay (5419.10), and the amendment is not approved, so it cannot resolve the conflict. Please provide an approved amendment matching the payroll gross_pay or otherwise resolve the gross-pay conflict."
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Need follow rules. Need determine decision. Record gross 5319.10, month 2026-04, allowed_deduction 207.83. Contract gross 5419.10 differs. Amendment present gross 5319.10, effective 2026-04, approved false. R7 order: missing gross? no. missing month? no. no reference? 2026-04 first-half yes. Optional contract_gross_pay present and differs from gross_pay, neither source takes precedence unless approved amendment resolves under R9. Otherwise clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY citing R7 R9. Amendment approved false, so does not resolve. Thus clarify. Need no calculated monetary fields. Include decision, reason_code, clauses, optional explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking resolution. Need exactly required answer fields? For clarify uses decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation permitted. So output JSON with decision "clarify", reason_code "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY", clauses ["R7","R9"], explanation short. Must not include monetary fields. Ensure no markdown. Use exact.