← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 92
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Single-turn · Task 92 (Calculation, at the wage cap)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | calculate | calculate | calculate | calculate |
| currency | LCR | LCR | LCR | LCR |
| gross pay | 3999.99 | 3999.99 | 3999.99 | 3999.99 |
| employee contribution | 280.00 | 280.00 | 280.00 | 280.00 |
| allowed deduction | 391.99 | 391.99 | 391.99 | 391.99 |
| taxable pay | 3328.00 | 3328.00 | 3328.00 | 3328.00 |
| income tax | 324.16 | 324.16 | 324.16 | 324.16 |
| net pay | 3003.84 | 3003.84 | 3003.84 | 3003.84 |
| clauses | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"96ed6aa66caaba7d-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "3999.99", "payroll_month": "2026-09", "allowed_deduction": "391.99"}}, "96ed6aa66caaba7d-contract": {"kind": "contract", "gross_pay": "3999.99"}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "3000.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.20"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.07", "cap": "4000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3000.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.22"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4.1s · $0.0018
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "calculate",
"currency": "LCR",
"gross_pay": "3999.99",
"employee_contribution": "280.00",
"allowed_deduction": "391.99",
"taxable_pay": "3328.00",
"income_tax": "324.16",
"net_pay": "3003.84",
"clauses": ["R1", "R2", "R3", "R4", "R5", "R6"]
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Need be careful. We have payroll record gross_pay 3999.99, month 2026-09, allowed_deduction 391.99. Contract gross_pay 3999.99 matches, no conflict. Authoritative schedule second-half for 2026-09: rate 0.07, cap 4000.00, deduction cap 400.00, free 1200.00, upper 3000.00, middle_rate 0.14, upper_rate 0.22. Need calculate. R3 employee contribution = rate * min(gross, wage cap). Gross 3999.99, cap 4000.00, min = 3999.99. Contribution = 3999.99 * 0.07 = 279.9993. Round half-up to two decimals: 280.00? 279.9993 -> third decimal? Let's do decimal: 3999.99*7/100 = 27999.93/100 = 279.9993. To two decimals: look at third decimal (9) after 279.99? Actually 279.9993: hundredths digit 9? Number 279.9993. To round to 2 decimals: 279.99 with next digit 9 (thousandths) so round up to 280.00. Yes. Allowed deduction = 391.99. Must not exceed deduction cap 400.00, okay. Must not exceed gross minus rounded employee contribution = 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99. 391.99 <= 3719.99. OK. Taxable pay = gross - employee_contribution - allowed_deduction = 3999.99 - 280.00 - 391.99 = 3327.? Compute: 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99. -391.99 = 3328.00? 3719.99 - 391.99 = 3328.00 exactly. Let's verify: 391.99 + 3328.00 = 3719.99. Yes taxable_pay = 3328.00. Income tax progressive: Tax-free amount 1200.00 untaxed. Upper bracket begins 3000.00. Middle rate 0.14 on portion above free up to upper. Taxable pay 3328.00. Portion from 1200 to 3000 = 1800.00 taxed at 0.14 = 252.00. Portion above 3000 = 3328.00 - 3000.00 = 328.00 taxed at upper rate 0.22 = 72.16. Total = 324.16. Round already two decimals. Do not round intermediate bracket products separately before summing? Here exact. Income_tax = 324.16. Net pay = gross - employee_contribution - allowed_deduction - income_tax = 3999.99 - 280.00 - 391.99 - 324.16 = ? 3999.99 - 280 = 3719.99. -391.99 = 3328.00. -324.16 = 3003.84. Alternatively gross - contrib - ded - tax. Net = 3003.84. Need return decision calculate, currency LCR, fields strings two decimals. Clauses: calculated answers cite R1 through R6, and R9 only when amendment needed. No amendment. So clauses likely ["R1","R2","R3","R4","R5","R6"]. Need exactly required answer fields and only clauses directly govern. Allowed fields include decision, currency, gross_pay, employee_contribution, allowed_deduction, taxable_pay, income_tax, net_pay, clauses. Optional explanation permitted but not needed. Need no Markdown. Ensure JSON object. Check if any issue: The source documents include contract gross_pay matching. No amendment. Good. Need maybe cite R1-R6. Could include R9? No. "Calculated answers cite R1 through R6, and also R9 only when an amendment is needed to resolve a conflict." So include R1-R6. Need ensure money strings with two decimal places. gross_pay "3999.99"; employee_contribution "280.00"; allowed_deduction "391.99"; taxable_pay "3328.00"; income_tax "324.16"; net_pay "3003.84". Currency "LCR". decision "calculate". Double-check R4: allowed deduction must not exceed selected deduction cap or gross pay minus rounded employee contribution. It doesn't. Also "The allowed deduction is withheld from take-home pay as well as reducing taxable pay." We subtracted. Potential subtlety: R3 contribution uses smaller of monthly gross pay and selected wage cap. Gross 3999.99 < cap 4000.00. Yes. Potential subtlety: Rounding contribution 279.9993 -> 280.00. Then taxable pay = 3999.99 - 280.00 - 391.99 = 3328.00. If unrounded contribution used, taxable = 3999.99 - 279.9993 - 391.99 = 3328.0007, income maybe 324.160154? But R3 says round contribution, R4 subtract rounded employee contribution. So yes. Income tax: taxable 3328.00. Middle portion = 3000 - 1200 = 1800 * .14 = 252. Upper = 328 * .22 = 72.16. Total 324.16. Net 3999.99 - 280 - 391.99 - 324.16 = 3003.84. Let's recompute: 3999.99 - 280 = 3719.99. 3719.99 - 391.99 = 3328.00. 3328.00 - 324.16 = 3003.84. Yes. Need final JSON only.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2.5s · $0.0018
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "calculate",
"currency": "LCR",
"gross_pay": "3999.99",
"employee_contribution": "280.00",
"allowed_deduction": "391.99",
"taxable_pay": "3328.00",
"income_tax": "324.16",
"net_pay": "3003.84",
"clauses": ["R1", "R2", "R3", "R4", "R5", "R6"]
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process. Need be careful. We have payroll record gross_pay 3999.99, payroll_month 2026-09, allowed_deduction 391.99. Contract gross_pay 3999.99 same. No conflict. Authoritative schedule second-half for 2026-09. Values: rate 0.07, cap 4000.00, deduction cap 400.00, free 1200.00, upper 3000.00, middle_rate 0.14, upper_rate 0.22. Need calculate. Check required: gross_pay present, month present. Month covered by schedule second-half. Contract same gross pay, no amendment needed. R2 money valid. allowed_deduction 391.99. Need check allowed_deduction <= deduction cap 400.00 and <= gross_pay minus rounded employee contribution. Compute employee contribution = rate * min(gross, wage cap). gross 3999.99, cap 4000.00, min = 3999.99. rate 0.07. 3999.99*0.07 = 279.9993? Let's calculate: 3999.99 * 7 /100 = 27999.93 /100 = 279.9993. Round half-up to 2 decimals = 280.00 (since third decimal 9? 279.9993 -> 280.00 yes). Employee contribution 280.00. Allowed deduction = 391.99. Check <= cap 400.00 yes. Check <= gross - rounded employee contribution = 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99. 391.99 <= 3719.99 yes. Taxable pay = gross - employee contribution - allowed deduction = 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99; minus 391.99 = 3328.00. Let's do exact: 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99. 3719.99 - 391.99 = 3328.00. yes. Income tax progressive: Taxable 3328.00. Free 1200.00 untaxed. Upper bracket begins 3000.00. Portion above free up to upper boundary: 3000 - 1200 = 1800 at middle 0.14 = 252.00. Portion above upper: 3328 - 3000 = 328 at upper 0.22 = 72.16. Total = 324.16. Round 324.16. Net pay = gross - employee contribution - allowed deduction - income tax = 3328.00 - 324.16 = 3003.84. Or 3999.99 - 280.00 - 391.99 - 324.16 = 3003.84. Need output decision calculate, currency LCR, fields strings two decimals. clauses supporting calculation. Need cite R1-R6? Since no amendment needed, cite R1 through R6. Maybe clauses array ["R1","R2","R3","R4","R5","R6"]. Need include only clauses directly govern answer. R9 not needed. Could include R1 for schedule selection, R2 arithmetic, R3 contribution, R4 deduction/taxable, R5 tax, R6 net/answer. yes. Need ensure no Markdown fences, exactly JSON object. Optional explanation permitted but not needed. Allowed answer fields for calculate: decision, currency, gross_pay, employee_contribution, allowed_deduction, taxable_pay, income_tax, net_pay, clauses. We can include no extra. Money strings two decimals. Let's double-check rounding half-up: 3999.99*0.07 = 279.9993 -> 280.00. If using decimal, yes. Tax: 1800*0.14 = 252.00. 328*0.22=72.16. total 324.16. Check allowed_deduction cap: R4 says must not exceed selected deduction cap or gross pay minus rounded employee contribution. 391.99 <= 400 and <=3719.99. OK. Potential issue: authoritative schedule replaces defaults. Yes. Potential issue: contract_gross_pay present and differs? It is same "3999.99". So no conflict. No amendment. Good. Need maybe mention "currency": "LCR". Final JSON. Ensure no prose.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2.9s · $0.0013
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "calculate",
"currency": "LCR",
"gross_pay": "3999.99",
"employee_contribution": "280.00",
"allowed_deduction": "391.99",
"taxable_pay": "3328.00",
"income_tax": "324.16",
"net_pay": "3003.84",
"clauses": ["R1", "R2", "R3", "R4", "R5", "R6"]
}
Reasoning
We need answer JSON only. Need process payroll. Need inspect rules. We have record gross_pay 3999.99, payroll_month 2026-09, allowed_deduction 391.99. Contract gross_pay 3999.99 matches, no conflict. Authoritative case reference schedule supplied. Need use second-half row for 2026-09: rate 0.07, cap 4000.00, deduction cap 400.00, free 1200.00, upper 3000.00, middle_rate 0.14, upper_rate 0.22.
Need calculate employee contribution = rate * min(gross, wage cap). gross 3999.99, cap 4000.00 -> min 3999.99. contribution = 0.07 * 3999.99 = 279.9993. Round half-up to two decimals: 280.00? 279.9993 -> 280.00 yes.
Allowed deduction = 391.99. Must not exceed deduction cap 400.00 or gross minus rounded employee contribution. Gross - contribution = 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99. 391.99 <= 3719.99 and <=400. OK.
Taxable pay = gross - employee contribution - allowed deduction = 3999.99 - 280.00 - 391.99 = 3328.00? Let's compute: 3999.99 - 280.00 = 3719.99. -391.99 = 3328.00 exactly.
Income tax progressive: taxable 3328.00. Free 1200.00. Upper bracket begins 3000.00. Portion above free up to upper: 3000 - 1200 = 1800 at 0.14 = 252.00. Portion above upper: 3328 - 3000 = 328 at 0.22 = 72.16. Total = 324.16. Round 324.16.
Net pay = gross - employee contribution - allowed deduction - income tax = 3999.99 - 280.00 - 391.99 - 324.16 = 3003.84? Compute: 3999.99 - 280 = 3719.99. -391.99 = 3328.00. -324.16 = 3003.84. Yes.
Need include clauses. Calculated answers cite R1 through R6, and also R9 only when amendment needed. No amendment needed. So clauses likely ["R1","R2","R3","R4","R5","R6"]. Need exact answer fields: decision, currency, gross_pay, employee_contribution, allowed_deduction, taxable_pay, income_tax, net_pay, clauses. Optional explanation permitted but likely not needed. Need ensure money strings two decimals.
Let's double-check if any issue with source documents? Contract gross_pay matches. The authoritative schedule replaces defaults for that case only. Use second-half. Good.
Need output JSON object no markdown. Ensure all fields. Maybe include clauses as array of strings. The instruction: "Use exactly the required answer fields and only the clauses that directly govern the answer." For calculate required fields include decision, currency, gross_pay, employee_contribution, allowed_deduction, taxable_pay, income_tax, net_pay, clauses. We can include explanation optional. Probably omit explanation. Need no input-only fields.
Let's craft:
{
"decision": "calculate",
"currency": "LCR",
"gross_pay": "3999.99",
"employee_contribution": "280.00",
"allowed_deduction": "391.99",
"taxable_pay": "3328.00",
"income_tax": "324.16",
"net_pay": "3003.84",
"clauses": ["R1","R2","R3","R4","R5","R6"]
}
Check if R2 needed? Yes arithmetic. R1 selecting row. R3 contribution. R4 deduction/taxable. R5 income tax. R6 net. Good.
Need ensure no markdown. Final only JSON.