← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 2 (Traps, month not covered)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 5 tool calls · 6.1s · $0.0016
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8177.17", "payroll_month": "2027-09", "allowed_deduction": "213.78"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll month is 2027-09, outside 2026. Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So this is a month without a reference row → reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but let me check the reference tables to be sure. The month is 2027-09. Let me look up references. Actually R1 says only 2026 is covered. 2027-09 is outside 2026 → clarification NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Let me still check reference tables to confirm there's no row. Let me call lookup_reference for both. Actually, the rule says "A month without a reference row: return decision clarify and reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7." So yes. But let me verify by looking up references.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
calculate(program="x = 0")Reasoning
The month 2027-09 is not covered by any reference row (only 2026-01 through 2026-12). So decision: clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. The answer fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses, and optional explanation. Let me produce JSON.
Tool
{
"results": {"x": "0"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2027-09 is outside the covered range (only 2026 is covered, with reference rows for 2026-01 through 2026-12). No applicable reference row exists, and an old row must not be extrapolated. Please provide a payroll month within 2026."
}
Reasoning
No calculation needed. Produce the clarify answer.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 4.5s · $0.0012
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8177.17", "payroll_month": "2027-09", "allowed_deduction": "213.78"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Payroll month 2027-09. Only 2026 is covered. So month without a reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but R4 says when month or applicable row absent, accept structurally valid deductions up to largest reference deduction cap for validation but do not calculate. But R7 order: missing gross pay, missing month, month without reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. The month 2027-09 is out of range (outside 2026). R1 says dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Let me double check no amendment/contract. The record only has gross_pay, payroll_month, allowed_deduction. So no conflict. Answer: decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2027-09 has no applicable reference row: only months in 2026 are covered by the reference schedule, and R1/R7 require clarification rather than extrapolating an old row. Please provide a payroll month within the covered range (2026-01 through 2026-12)."
}
Reasoning
Reference rows only cover 2026. Payroll month is 2027-09, which is outside. So NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0012
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8177.17", "payroll_month": "2027-09", "allowed_deduction": "213.78"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Payroll month is 2027-09, which is outside 2026. R1 says only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Rule 3: a month without a reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Wait, let me check. The month 2027-09 is outside the covered range. R7 item 3 says "A month without a reference row". Let me check the reference tables to confirm there's no row for 2027-09. Actually R1 says only 2026 is covered. So 2027-09 has no applicable reference. Return clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Let me still check lookup_reference to be thorough. But the rule says only 2026 covered, so no reference row. Let me verify.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2027-09 has no applicable reference row: only months in 2026 are covered. Please provide a payroll month within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2027-09, which is outside 2026. No applicable reference row. Return clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7.