← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 28
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 28 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 5.3s · $0.0014
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5907abef11c974cf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5907abef11c974cf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Wait, let me check. The record: {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}. No payroll_month.
Hmm, but R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → not missing. 2. Missing payroll_month → missing! So we should return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Wait, but maybe payroll_month is elsewhere. Let me re-read. The record only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month. So missing payroll_month.
Actually wait, let me double-check there isn't a reference table needed. The task says reference rows available only through lookup_reference. But we don't have a month, so we can't select. R7 says missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7.
But hold on—maybe I should check the documents more thoroughly. There's only one document. Let me verify no other fields. The record is just gross_pay and allowed_deduction.
So decision: clarify, reason_code: MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses: R1, R7.
Let me provide explanation naming the unresolved blocker.
Actually, wait. Let me reconsider: is payroll_month required in the record? R1 says gross_pay and payroll_month are required. The record lacks payroll_month. So yes, MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Include explanation asking for resolution.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (2026) to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
The record lacks payroll_month. So we cannot select a reference row. R7 step 2: Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Return JSON.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 21.6s · $0.0014
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5907abef11c974cf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5907abef11c974cf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month? Let me check. The record is {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}. There's no payroll_month field. Hmm.
Wait, R1 says gross_pay and payroll_month are required. The record doesn't include payroll_month. So we should return MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
But wait, maybe the payroll_month is elsewhere. Let me check if there are other documents. list_documents returned only one document. So payroll_month is missing.
Actually, let me re-read. The record contains gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month. So under R7, step 2: missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7.
Hmm, but wait — should I check the reference tables? The month is needed to select the row. Since payroll_month is missing, we return MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Let me double-check the order. Step 1: missing gross_pay — it's present. Step 2: missing payroll_month — it's missing. So return clarify, MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Yes.
Let me be careful: is there any chance payroll_month is embedded somewhere else? The document only has the record. So yes.
Answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation naming the unresolved blocker.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so the applicable reference row cannot be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (2026) to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has no payroll_month. So we cannot select a reference row. Return MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Wait, but R7 order: missing gross_pay first (present), then missing payroll_month. So MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Actually, let me reconsider. The record is {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}. There's no payroll_month. So yes, MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Final answer.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 6.0s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents and looking up references.
Tool
[
{"id": "5907abef11c974cf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5907abef11c974cf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides gross_pay and allowed_deduction but omits the required payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (2026) to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. Wait, let me check. The record: {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}. No payroll_month field. Hmm.
Order of checks: 1. Missing gross_pay — present. 2. Missing payroll_month — missing! Return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7.
Wait, but maybe there are more documents. list_documents returned only one. So payroll_month is missing.
So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1 and R7.
Let me double-check the record doesn't contain payroll_month. It's {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}}. No month.
So answer: clarify.
The required fields: decision, reason_code, clauses, plus optional explanation.