← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 41
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 41 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 50.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (-50%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | (malformed) | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | (malformed) | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | (malformed) | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 -50.0% malformed · 2 tool calls · 3.1s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "8.69"}
}
Assistant
The payroll record has no `gross_pay`; it contains only `payroll_month` (`2026-10`) and `allowed_deduction` (`8.69`). Under R7 step 1, a missing required `gross_pay` must be clarified before any calculation, so no payslip is produced.
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not provide a required gross_pay value (only payroll_month and allowed_deduction are present). Please supply the employee's gross_pay for 2026-10 so the payroll can be calculated."
}
```
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-10, allowed_deduction 8.69. But no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarification MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Wait, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Yes. Let me confirm no other documents. Only one. So gross_pay missing. Return decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. Include short explanation naming the unresolved blocker. No monetary fields.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 5.5s · $0.0011
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "8.69"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-10, allowed_deduction 8.69, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → R7 step 1: clarify, MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Wait, but there's no gross_pay. Let me check. The record only has payroll_month and allowed_deduction. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Let me double-check there isn't more. Only one document. So gross_pay missing. Answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. Include short explanation naming unresolved blocker. The allowed answer fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation. Note: R7 order says check missing gross_pay first. So it's MISSING_GROSS_PAY even though month exists. Let me not call calculate. Actually we don't need reference lookup either. Return JSON.
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-10 does not include a gross_pay value, so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide the employee's monthly gross pay in LCR (a non-negative decimal with at most two fractional digits)."
}
Reasoning
The month 2026-10 is covered by second-half reference. But gross_pay is missing. So still MISSING_GROSS_PAY per R7 order step 1. Return clarify.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 4.5s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "8.69"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-10 does not include a gross_pay value (and no contract or amendment supplies one), so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide the missing gross_pay amount."
}
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-10 and allowed_deduction 8.69, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Wait, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. The record doesn't have gross_pay. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1 and R7. But wait—should I double check whether there's a contract_gross_pay or amendment? The record only shows payroll_month and allowed_deduction. So gross_pay is missing. Let me confirm there aren't other documents. Only one document. So answer is clarify. Actually, let me be careful—maybe the document read only returned partial? It returned the record with two fields. No gross_pay. So MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Return JSON with decision, reason_code, clauses, and explanation.