← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 48
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 48 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.1s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month 2026-09 but no gross_pay value (and no explicit null placeholder). Gross pay is required under R1, so R7 step 1 requires clarification before any calculation. Please provide the employee's monthly gross_pay for 2026-09."
}
Reasoning
The record only has payroll_month 2026-09, no gross_pay. So missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, check: gross_pay is required. The record has only payroll_month. So missing gross_pay. Return clarify. But should I check other things? Order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify. So that's it. Let me double check there's no other document. Only one document. So answer.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.1s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month 2026-09 but no gross_pay (and no value is present to infer it from). Because gross_pay is a required input and is missing, calculation is blocked; please provide the monthly gross pay in LCR so the payroll can be computed."
}
Reasoning
The record only has payroll_month "2026-09". No gross_pay. So missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Wait, check required inputs order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Yes. Let me double-check there's no other document. Only one document. So gross_pay missing. Return decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1 and R7. Include explanation. The record has payroll_month 2026-09 which is in 2026, but gross_pay missing. So missing gross_pay takes precedence. Answer JSON.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 6.1s · $0.0009
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record only has payroll_month, no gross_pay. So missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay. Yes gross_pay is missing. So return clarify. Let me confirm there's no contract_gross_pay or amendment. The record only shows payroll_month. So gross_pay missing.
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides payroll_month 2026-09 but no gross_pay (required under R1). Provide the monthly gross pay amount so the payslip can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The record is missing gross_pay, which is the first clarification check. So the answer is clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY. The order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. This takes precedence even though month is present and covered. Return JSON.