← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 54
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 54 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0009
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "341.21"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 does not include a gross_pay value (only payroll_month and allowed_deduction are present). Gross pay is required under R1, so no payslip can be calculated. Please provide the missing gross_pay amount."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record is missing gross_pay. Let me check. Record: payroll_month "2026-01", allowed_deduction "341.21". No gross_pay. R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Wait, but let me check if there's a contract_gross_pay or amendment. The record only has payroll_month and allowed_deduction. No gross_pay. So missing gross_pay → clarify. But wait, should I check other documents? Only one document. Let me double-check reference tables? Not needed since missing gross pay. Actually order matters: missing gross_pay first. So reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY. But let me reconsider - maybe there's an amendment in the record? No, record only has those two fields. So gross_pay missing. Return clarify with reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1 and R7. Let me verify there's no other data. list_documents returned only one. Good. Answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.6s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll")Reasoning
Only one document. Let me read it.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "341.21"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month (2026-01) and allowed_deduction (341.21) but no gross_pay. Gross pay is required under R1, and a missing required value (including explicit null) must be clarified rather than guessed or defaulted, so processing is blocked pending the gross_pay amount."
}
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-01 and allowed_deduction 341.21, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → R7 case 1: MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, let me check. Missing gross_pay is the first check. The record doesn't have gross_pay. So return clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. But wait, should I check for other documents? Only one document. So gross_pay is missing. Actually, let me reconsider. The record only has payroll_month and allowed_deduction. No gross_pay. So decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Let me provide the answer.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 3.7s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "341.21"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month (2026-01) and allowed_deduction (341.21) but no gross_pay. Gross pay is required before any calculation can proceed, so please provide the employee's monthly gross_pay in LCR."
}
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-01 and allowed_deduction 341.21, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Wait, let me check. The record is a payroll record. Missing gross_pay is required. So return clarify. But let me double check there aren't other documents. Only one document. So gross_pay is missing. R7 step 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Let me confirm no gross_pay field. The record has only payroll_month and allowed_deduction. So missing gross_pay.