← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 56
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 56 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 9.7s · $0.0014
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "2735c93fe2c3ddab-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2735c93fe2c3ddab-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3203.76", "allowed_deduction": "359.44"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
No payroll_month field. Hmm. Let me check. The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. So missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Wait, but let me double check—maybe there's a reference table lookup needed. But payroll_month is missing. Per R7 order: 1. missing gross_pay (present), 2. missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7. But wait, maybe there's more. Let me re-read the document. It only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month, no contract_gross_pay, no amendment. So the answer is clarify, MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Let me verify there aren't other documents. Only one document listed. So decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses ["R1","R7"]. Include explanation naming the unresolved blocker.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (2026) to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has no payroll_month. So it's missing. Per R7 step 2, return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. The reference rows exist but we can't select one without a month. So the answer is clarification.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 5 tool calls · 7.1s · $0.0016
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")I'll start by retrieving the case documents and reference data.
Tool
[
{"id": "2735c93fe2c3ddab-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2735c93fe2c3ddab-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3203.76", "allowed_deduction": "359.44"}
}
Assistant
calculate(program="x = 1")Reasoning
The record has gross_pay 3203.76 and allowed_deduction 359.44, but no payroll_month! Wait, let me check. The record: gross_pay, allowed_deduction. No payroll_month. Hmm. Wait, R1 says gross_pay and payroll_month are required. The record doesn't have payroll_month. So missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Let me double check the document. It only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. So payroll_month is missing. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7. Wait order: 1. Missing gross_pay - present. 2. Missing payroll_month - missing. So return MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But hold on—maybe there's a reference_tables schedule in a document? Only one document. Let me check if there are more docs. list_documents returned one. So no. So answer: clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Hmm, but wait—could payroll_month be elsewhere? The record is the only source. No. Also note "Only 2026 is covered." No month given. Answer with explanation naming unresolved blocker.
Tool
{
"results": {"x": "1"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (3203.76) and allowed_deduction (359.44) but no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected and no payslip can be calculated. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (a 2026 month covered by a reference row)."
}
Reasoning
No calculation needed. The payroll record lacks payroll_month, so clarification required. Return JSON.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.1s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "2735c93fe2c3ddab-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2735c93fe2c3ddab-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3203.76", "allowed_deduction": "359.44"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not include a payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (2026) to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
The record lacks payroll_month. Wait, let me check. It only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month. So we need to clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Wait, but let me double check — maybe there's more. The record shows only gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month, no contract_gross_pay, no amendment. Per R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay - no, present. 2. Missing payroll_month - yes → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Hmm, but wait. Let me reconsider. The task says retrieve case inputs. There's only one document. So payroll_month is missing. Actually, let me be careful. Maybe the payroll_month is elsewhere. The document only has the record with gross_pay and allowed_deduction. So yes, missing payroll_month. So answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7, explanation. Let me produce JSON.