← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 57
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 57 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.1s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, which is required to select the applicable reference row. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (a 2026 month covered by a reference row)."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record lacks payroll_month. Wait, R1 says gross_pay and payroll_month are required. The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. So missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Let me check the order: 1. Missing gross_pay → not missing. 2. Missing payroll_month → yes missing. Return clarify citing R1 and R7. Wait, but maybe there's a reference table? Let me double check documents. Only one document. So payroll_month is missing. Actually, let me reconsider. Maybe the month is elsewhere. The record only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. So missing payroll_month. Return decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7, and explanation.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 8.6s · $0.0017
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. Wait, payroll_month is required. But the record doesn't include it. Hmm. Let me check — the record only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. So payroll_month is missing → R7 case 2: MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Wait, but maybe payroll_month is elsewhere. Let me check if there are other documents. Only one document. So payroll_month is missing.
Actually wait, let me re-read. The record: {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}. No payroll_month. So missing payroll_month → clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7.
But hold on — maybe the payroll_month is supplied elsewhere, like in the task prompt? The prompt says "Process this monthly payroll record". The record doesn't have payroll_month. Hmm.
Let me double check by re-reading. The document is a payroll record with gross_pay and allowed_deduction only. There's no payroll_month field.
Hmm, but maybe I should look more carefully. Actually the rule says payroll_month required. Since it's absent, we clarify.
But wait — should I check the reference tables? The month is needed to select the row. Without month, we can't. R7 order: 1. missing gross_pay (present), 2. missing payroll_month (missing) → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
So answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses [R1, R7], explanation.
Let me make sure there isn't another document or the month hidden. list_documents returned only one. So yes.
Actually, let me reconsider: maybe I should double-check whether there might be a payroll_month embedded. No.
So answer.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (3362.67) and allowed_deduction (72.10) but no payroll_month, which is required under R1 and must be used to select the applicable reference row. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (a 2026 month covered by a reference row) so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record lacks a payroll_month. Per R7 step 2, missing payroll_month → clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
The record has gross_pay present, so step 1 passes. Step 2 fails.
Answer JSON:
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "..."
}
The explanation should name the unresolved blocker and ask for its resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 6.2s · $0.0012
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Let me check the document more carefully. It only contains gross_pay and allowed_deduction. There's no payroll_month field.
Wait, missing payroll_month → clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But let me check if there are other documents. list_documents returned only one document.
Hmm, but maybe the record is missing payroll_month. Let me re-read. The record: {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}. No payroll_month. So R7 step 2: Missing payroll_month → clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7.
But wait, should I check for a reference table? The month is required. Since it's missing, we clarify.
Actually let me double check there's no other document. Only one. So indeed payroll_month is missing.
Let me verify: R7 order: 1. missing gross_pay - present. 2. missing payroll_month - missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
So answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses [R1, R7], explanation.
Do I need to call lookup_reference? Not necessary since month is missing. But let me be careful - maybe the month is embedded somewhere. Let me re-read the document. It's just kind payroll with record. No month.
So final answer.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so the applicable reference row cannot be selected. Provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM (a 2026 month) to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has no payroll_month. So we cannot select a reference row. R7 step 2: missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Return JSON.