← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 59
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 59 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.1s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "c9b1c2f805f17e4b-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="c9b1c2f805f17e4b-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-07", "allowed_deduction": "233.10"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-07 is missing the required gross_pay, so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide the employee's monthly gross pay."
}
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-07 and allowed_deduction 233.10, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay. Yes gross_pay is missing. So return clarify. No contract_gross_pay present. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. Include explanation naming unresolved blocker.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.2s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "c9b1c2f805f17e4b-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="c9b1c2f805f17e4b-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-07", "allowed_deduction": "233.10"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-07 has no gross_pay value (missing required input). Please supply the employee's monthly gross pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-07 and allowed_deduction 233.10, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → R7 step 1: MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but R7 says missing gross_pay returns clarify. Let me check: gross_pay is required. The record lacks gross_pay. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Let me double check there's no other document or amendment. Only one document. So answer: clarify. Actually wait, let me reconsider. The order: 1. Missing gross_pay. Yes. So return clarify. Return JSON with decision, reason_code, clauses, and optional explanation.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 5.6s · $0.0009
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "c9b1c2f805f17e4b-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="c9b1c2f805f17e4b-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-07", "allowed_deduction": "233.10"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-07 and allowed_deduction 233.10, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, let me check if there are other documents. Only one document. So gross_pay is missing. Return clarify. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Yes. Return decision clarify.
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-07 does not include a gross_pay value, so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide the employee's monthly gross pay in LCR."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record lacks gross_pay. So per R7 step 1, missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Even though a reference row exists, gross_pay is missing. Return: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. Plus explanation.