← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 70
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 70 (Traps, conflicting pay (draft amendment))
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R7 R9 | R7 R9 | R7 R9 | R7 R9 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 6 tool calls · 7.6s · $0.0017
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-payroll", "kind": "payroll"},
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-contract", "kind": "contract"},
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-amendment", "kind": "amendment"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-payroll")read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-contract")read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-amendment")Reasoning
Let me read the documents.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3730.24", "payroll_month": "2026-11", "allowed_deduction": "269.21"}
}
Tool
{
"kind": "contract",
"gross_pay": "3731.24"
}
Tool
{
"kind": "amendment",
"gross_pay": "3730.24",
"effective_month": "2026-01",
"approved": false
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Payroll: gross_pay 3730.24, month 2026-11, allowed_deduction 269.21. Contract gross_pay 3731.24 differs from gross_pay 3730.24. So there's a conflict. Amendment: gross_pay 3730.24, effective_month 2026-01, approved: false. Not approved, so it does not resolve the conflict. Therefore return clarify with CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, citing R7 and R9. Wait, let me check order. R7 order: 1 missing gross_pay, 2 missing payroll_month, 3 month without reference row, 4 conflicting gross_pay. Month 2026-11: is there a reference row? Need to check reference. Only 2026 covered. Let's check both halves. The month 2026-11 is second-half presumably. Let me lookup. Actually, the conflict check requires a reference row existing first? Order: step 3 is month without reference row -> clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Step 4 conflict. So we should first verify the month has a reference row. Let me look up reference for second-half. But even so, the conflict is the answer. But we must confirm reference row exists (otherwise NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE takes precedence). Let me lookup both references.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The payroll gross_pay (3730.24) conflicts with the contract gross_pay (3731.24). The only amendment matching the payroll amount is unapproved, so it does not resolve the conflict under R9. Please provide an approved amendment with a matching amount and effective month no later than 2026-11 (or reconcile the two gross pay figures)."
}
Reasoning
Month 2026-11 is in second-half (2026-07 to 2026-12). So reference row exists. Now conflict: contract_gross_pay 3731.24 differs from gross_pay 3730.24. Amendment approved false, so does not resolve. Return clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY citing R7 and R9. Check: amendment effective_month 2026-01 <= 2026-11, amount equals gross_pay 3730.24, but approved false. So doesn't resolve. Yes. Return JSON.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 4.6s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-payroll", "kind": "payroll"},
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-contract", "kind": "contract"},
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-amendment", "kind": "amendment"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-payroll")read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-contract")read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-amendment")Reasoning
Read all documents.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3730.24", "payroll_month": "2026-11", "allowed_deduction": "269.21"}
}
Tool
{
"kind": "contract",
"gross_pay": "3731.24"
}
Tool
{
"kind": "amendment",
"gross_pay": "3730.24",
"effective_month": "2026-01",
"approved": false
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The contract gross pay (3731.24 LCR) differs from the payroll record gross pay (3730.24 LCR), and the only amendment (3730.24 LCR, effective 2026-01) is not approved, so it does not resolve the conflict. Please provide an approved amendment matching the payroll gross pay, or confirm which gross pay is authoritative."
}
Reasoning
We have a conflict: contract_gross_pay 3731.24 differs from gross_pay 3730.24. Amendment: gross_pay 3730.24, effective 2026-01, approved false. Not approved, so does not resolve. So return clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, citing R7 and R9. Let me double check: R7 step 4: if optional contract_gross_pay present and differs from gross_pay, neither source takes precedence unless an approved amendment resolves it under R9. Otherwise return clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY citing R7 and R9. Amendment approved = false, so unresolved. Return clarify. Need decision, reason_code, clauses, and short explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 6 tool calls · 6.1s · $0.0016
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-payroll", "kind": "payroll"},
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-contract", "kind": "contract"},
{"id": "a2c640867c589a4e-amendment", "kind": "amendment"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-payroll")read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-contract")read_document(document_id="a2c640867c589a4e-amendment")Reasoning
Let me read all documents.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3730.24", "payroll_month": "2026-11", "allowed_deduction": "269.21"}
}
Tool
{
"kind": "contract",
"gross_pay": "3731.24"
}
Tool
{
"kind": "amendment",
"gross_pay": "3730.24",
"effective_month": "2026-01",
"approved": false
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Let me analyze. Payroll record: gross_pay 3730.24, payroll_month 2026-11, allowed_deduction 269.21. Contract gross_pay: 3731.24, differs from gross_pay 3730.24. So conflicting gross pay. Amendment: gross_pay 3730.24, effective_month 2026-01, approved: false. Not approved → does not resolve conflict. So return clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY citing R7 and R9. Wait, check order: R7 checks: 1 missing gross_pay - present. 2 missing payroll_month - present. 3 month without reference row - need to check reference rows. 2026-11 is in 2026. Let me check reference. Actually let me check reference rows to confirm 2026-11 has a row. But regardless, the conflict... Let me check reference first. Actually order: check 3 before 4. Let me look up reference to ensure 2026-11 is covered.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The payroll record shows gross_pay 3730.24, but the contract shows a different gross_pay of 3731.24. The provided amendment (gross_pay 3730.24, effective_month 2026-01) is not approved, so it does not resolve the conflict under R9. Please provide an approved amendment matching the payroll gross_pay, or confirm which gross pay is authoritative."
}
Reasoning
2026-11 falls in second-half (2026-07 to 2026-12). So reference row exists. Now check conflict: contract_gross_pay 3731.24 differs from gross_pay 3730.24. Amendment not approved → doesn't resolve. So CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY. Return decision clarify, reason_code CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R7, R9, plus explanation.