← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 77
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 77 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 5.4s · $0.0012
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-12, allowed_deduction 354.30, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Wait, let me check order. R7: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify. Yes. The record has no gross_pay. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. But wait, should I check whether there's a contract_gross_pay? The record only shows payroll_month and allowed_deduction. No gross_pay. So missing. Let me double-check there are no other documents. list_documents returned only one. So yes. Answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation naming the unresolved blocker. Hmm, but the instruction says "Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer." For clarification, fields: decision, reason_code, clauses, plus optional explanation. Let me produce that. But should I verify gross_pay truly missing? The record doesn't include gross_pay at all. Yes. Actually wait — let me reconsider. The rule says missing required values include explicit null. gross_pay is absent. So MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Let me output.
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-12 has no gross_pay value (and no approved amendment supplies one), so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide the monthly gross pay in LCR."
}
Reasoning
The record is missing gross_pay, so we must clarify per R7 order item 1. Even though a reference row exists, missing gross_pay takes priority. Return clarify with reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1 and R7.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 4.2s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents and looking up references.
Tool
[
{"id": "2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month 2026-12 and allowed_deduction 354.30 but no gross_pay (and no contract_gross_pay or approved amendment). Gross pay is required before any payslip can be calculated, so please provide the employee's gross_pay for 2026-12."
}
Reasoning
The record: payroll_month 2026-12, allowed_deduction 354.30. But gross_pay is missing. Wait, is there a contract_gross_pay? No. The record only has payroll_month and allowed_deduction. gross_pay missing → R7 step 1: MISSING_GROSS_PAY. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Let me double check there's no other document. Only one document. So gross_pay missing. Return JSON.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 4.5s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll")Reasoning
Read the document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides payroll_month 2026-12 and an allowed_deduction, but no gross_pay (and no amendment supplies it). Gross pay is required to compute payroll, so please provide the employee's monthly gross_pay."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-12" and allowed_deduction "354.30", but no gross_pay. Wait, let me check. The record only has payroll_month and allowed_deduction. gross_pay is missing.
Per R7 order:
1. Missing gross_pay: return clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7.
So gross_pay is missing. Let me double-check there's no contract_gross_pay or amendment. The record only has payroll_month and allowed_deduction.
So missing gross_pay → clarify.
Wait, but let me make sure. The record is {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}. No gross_pay. So MISSING_GROSS_PAY.
But should I check reference rows? The order says check gross_pay first. So return clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY.
Let me provide the answer.
Reason code: MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1 and R7.
Include a short explanation naming the unresolved blocker.
No monetary fields.