← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 83
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 83 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 50.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (-50%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | (malformed) | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | (malformed) | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | (malformed) | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 5.9s · $0.0014
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Wait, R1 requires gross_pay and payroll_month. Let me check: the record lacks payroll_month. Hmm, but maybe the reference lookup gives effective months. Let me look up references.
Actually wait, missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But let me double check the document - maybe there's more. The record only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month.
Hmm, but let me check the reference tables to see months. Actually the rule says missing payroll_month → clarify. But let me be careful—maybe the payroll_month is embedded elsewhere. Let me re-read: record = {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}. No payroll_month.
Wait, but the task says "Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference." Let me look them up anyway to confirm months.
Actually, if payroll_month is missing, we return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7. But let me verify there's nothing else. Let me check both references to be thorough.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.06",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected and payroll cannot be determined. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (a 2026 month covered by a reference row)."
}
Reasoning
The record lacks payroll_month. So per R7 step 2, missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But wait, let me reconsider. The record has gross_pay present. payroll_month is missing. So the answer is clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Hmm, but is it possible the payroll_month is provided somewhere? The document only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. So yes, missing payroll_month. Actually, wait. Let me reconsider the order of checks. R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Gross pay present, so no. 2. Missing payroll_month → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Yes. So decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1 and R7. Let me produce the JSON with explanation.
Rollout #2 -50.0% malformed · 4 tool calls · 3.6s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents and looking at references.
Tool
[
{"id": "4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.06",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}
}
Assistant
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so the applicable reference row cannot be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (a 2026 month) to resolve this blocker."
}
```
Reasoning
The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Let me re-read. The record: {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}. No payroll_month.
Wait, R7 order: 1 missing gross_pay, 2 missing payroll_month. Gross pay present. Payroll month missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Hmm, but maybe there's more in the document. Let me check. The document only shows those fields. So payroll_month is missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7.
Wait, but let me double-check whether there might be additional documents. list_documents returned only one. So yes.
Actually, let me reconsider - maybe the payroll_month is embedded elsewhere. The record fields are gross_pay and allowed_deduction only. No payroll_month. So missing payroll month.
Reason code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but omits the required payroll_month (no YYYY-MM value, and no explicit null). A reference row cannot be selected without it, so the month is an unresolved blocker. Please provide the payroll_month (YYYY-MM, 2026) to proceed."
}
Reasoning
The record lacks payroll_month. Wait, it has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. Per R7, missing payroll_month returns clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Wait, let me check. The record: gross_pay "3229.23", allowed_deduction "40.33". No payroll_month. So missing payroll_month → clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. But wait, maybe there's a reference table that determines the month? No, the month is required input. There's no payroll_month field. Let me double-check by reading again—only one document. So indeed missing payroll_month. Hmm, but let me reconsider: maybe the reference lookup reveals months. But R1 says payroll_month is required. Missing → clarify. Actually wait, let me re-read the record. It only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. So payroll_month is missing. Return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Let me confirm there's no other document. Only one. Let me check the reference tables just in case? The task says reference rows available only through lookup_reference. But since payroll_month is missing, we can't select. Actually R7 order: check missing gross_pay first (present), then missing payroll_month → clarify. So answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7, explanation. Let me not call lookup_reference since it's not needed. Actually I could, but no. The order says missing payroll_month triggers clarify. Good. Let me produce the JSON.