← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 87
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 87 (Traps, month not covered)
Mean 97.8%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (93%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 93.3% explanation · 4 tool calls · 8.2s · $0.0014
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 33.3% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b13790770c6c4e28-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b13790770c6c4e28-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3876.02", "payroll_month": "2025-11", "allowed_deduction": "102.05"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Payroll month 2025-11. Only 2026 is covered. So month without a reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but let me check the reference tables to be sure. Let me lookup first-half and second-half. Actually the rules say only 2026 is covered. 2025-11 is outside 2026. Let me verify with lookup_reference.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month is 2025-11, but the reference schedule only covers 2026 (first-half 2026-01 through 2026-06, second-half 2026-07 through 2026-12). No reference row applies to 2025-11, and an old row must not be extrapolated. Please provide a payroll month within the covered 2026 range."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-11, which is not covered by any reference row (only 2026-01 to 2026-12). So decision: clarify, reason_code: NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Order of checks: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, month without a reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Yes. Return JSON with decision, reason_code, clauses, and short explanation.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 7.7s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b13790770c6c4e28-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b13790770c6c4e28-payroll")Reasoning
Read the document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3876.02", "payroll_month": "2025-11", "allowed_deduction": "102.05"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Payroll month 2025-11. Only 2026 is covered. So month without reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but let me check the reference lookup to be sure. The month 2025-11 is outside 2026, so no applicable reference. R7 item 3. Let me confirm by lookup? The rule says only 2026 covered. So no applicable reference. Return clarify. Actually, let me double-check whether there's a reference row covering 2025-11. Let me look up both references.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-11 has no applicable reference row (only months in 2026 are covered), so no payslip can be calculated. Please provide a payroll month within a covered reference period."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-11, which is not covered by any reference row (only 2026-01 through 2026-12). So return clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 10.2s · $0.0016
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b13790770c6c4e28-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b13790770c6c4e28-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3876.02", "payroll_month": "2025-11", "allowed_deduction": "102.05"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-11, which is outside 2026. R1 says only 2026 is covered, dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So this is NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Wait, let me check. R7 rule 3: A month without a reference row: return clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. The month 2025-11 is outside 2026, so no reference row. Let me verify by checking the reference tables. Let me lookup references to confirm.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-11 has no reference row: the supplied schedules cover only 2026-01 through 2026-06 and 2026-07 through 2026-12, and R1 limits these rules to 2026. Please provide a payroll month within a covered reference period (or the applicable reference schedule) so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-11. Reference rows cover 2026-01 to 2026-06 and 2026-07 to 2026-12. So 2025-11 has no applicable reference row. Return clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but there's no contract_gross_pay or amendment. The order of checks: 1 missing gross_pay, 2 missing payroll_month, 3 month without reference row, 4 conflicting contract. Gross pay present, month present but no applicable row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Let me produce the JSON. Include explanation naming the unresolved blocker.