← Heatmap / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Task 106
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · Tool use · Task 106 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 3.9s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b256826a42768acd-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b256826a42768acd-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-04"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month 2026-04 but no gross_pay (and no value can be inferred from a contract or amendment), so payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide the employee's gross_pay for 2026-04."
}
Reasoning
The record only has payroll_month. Missing gross_pay. So R7 step 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.
Wait, but let me double-check whether there's more. The record is {"payroll_month": "2026-04"}. No gross_pay. So missing gross_pay.
Return decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1 and R7, plus short explanation.
Let me confirm no other documents. Only one. So answer.
Should I look up reference? Not needed since missing gross pay comes first. But rules say check order: missing gross_pay first. So clarify.
Answer fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 5.1s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b256826a42768acd-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b256826a42768acd-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-04"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies payroll_month 2026-04 but no gross_pay (required by R1). Without gross pay the payroll cannot be calculated, so please provide the employee's monthly gross_pay in LCR."
}
Reasoning
The record only contains payroll_month "2026-04". No gross_pay. Per R7, missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Wait, check required order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify. Yes, gross_pay is missing. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. Do we need to check reference? Not needed. But let me just confirm there's no other document. Only one document. So gross_pay missing. Answer JSON: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 10.7s · $0.0011
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "b256826a42768acd-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b256826a42768acd-payroll")Reasoning
Let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-04"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll record only has payroll_month: 2026-04. No gross_pay. So missing gross_pay → reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Yes. But let me also check reference tables? Not needed since gross_pay missing. But let me confirm there's no other document. Only one document. So gross_pay is missing. Return decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7, plus explanation.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.06",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-04 does not include a gross_pay value (it is absent, not a substitute zero). R7 requires clarification before calculation when the required gross_pay is missing, so no payslip can be computed. Please provide the employee's monthly gross pay in LCR."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record is missing gross_pay. Under R7 step 1, missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Return JSON.