← Heatmap / GLM 5.3 Flash · Task 44
GLM 5.3 Flash · Single-turn · Task 44 (Traps, month not covered)
Mean 50.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (-50%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | (malformed) | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | (malformed) | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE |
| clauses | R1 R7 | (malformed) | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"93c6cd218be71e1f-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "2246.04", "payroll_month": "2025-07", "allowed_deduction": "103.13"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3600.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.18"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.08", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "2800.00", "middle_rate": "0.12", "upper_rate": "0.24"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 -50.0% malformed · 23.5s · $0.0006
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": [
"R1",
"R7"
],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-07 falls outside the covered year; only 2026 months have reference rows, and the case schedule does not extend coverage to 2025. Please supply a payroll month within 2026 so the applicable reference row can be selected."
}
```
Reasoning
Let me analyze this payroll record.
The payroll month is "2025-07". According to R1, only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Specifically, R7 item 3: "A month without a reference row: return decision: 'clarify' and reason_code: 'NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE', citing R1 and R7. Do not extrapolate an old row."
2025-07 has no reference row (only 2026 is covered). So the answer is clarify with reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7.
Note the case includes an authoritative reference schedule, but that schedule covers first-half and second-half of 2026 presumably — the period boundaries stay the same (first-half = 2026-01 through 2026-06, second-half = 2026-07 through 2026-12). So 2025-07 still has no applicable reference row.
Also, R4 says: "When the month or applicable row is absent, accept structurally valid deductions up to 350.00 for task validation, but do not calculate a payslip or assume a reference row." The allowed_deduction is 103.13, structurally valid, but we don't calculate.
So the answer:
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "..."
}
```
The explanation should be short, naming the unresolved blocker and asking for its resolution. The blocker: payroll month 2025-07 is outside 2026, which is the only covered year; no reference row applies. Ask for a payroll month within 2026 (or a covered period).
Allowed answer fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation string permitted.
Do not include input-only fields like payroll_month. The explanation can mention 2025-07 though? The rule says "Do not include input-only fields such as payroll_month" — that refers to fields, not explanation text. I'll mention it in the explanation text, which should be fine.
Let me write the JSON.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 14.3s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-07 is outside 2026, the only period covered by the reference rows (the case schedule's first-half/second-half boundaries remain 2026-01 through 2026-06 and 2026-07 through 2026-12). No applicable reference row exists for this month, so no payslip can be calculated. Please provide a payroll month within 2026 or a covering reference row to resolve this."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-07, which is outside 2026. Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Specifically, a month without a reference row: return clarify with reason_code "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", citing R1 and R7. Note the case schedule is authoritative for the case, but it only covers first-half and second-half of 2026 (period boundaries stay the same: first-half = 2026-01 through 2026-06, second-half = 2026-07 through 2026-12). So 2025-07 has no applicable reference row. Do not extrapolate. Answer: clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses ["R1", "R7"], with a short explanation naming the unresolved blocker and asking for its resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 9.5s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-07 is outside 2026, the only period covered by the rulebook and the case reference schedule, so no applicable reference row exists. Please provide a payroll month within 2026 (or an applicable reference row) to proceed."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-07, which is outside 2026. Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So decision: clarify, reason_code: NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7.
The case schedule only covers first-half and second-half but those map to 2026 months, not 2025. So no applicable reference row for 2025-07.
Answer: {"decision": "clarify", "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", "clauses": ["R1", "R7"], with explanation.