← Heatmap / GLM 5.3 Flash · Task 7
GLM 5.3 Flash · Tool use · Task 7 (Calculation, wage cap binds)
Mean 50.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (-50%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | calculate | calculate | (malformed) | calculate |
| currency | LCR | LCR | (malformed) | LCR |
| gross pay | 8370.45 | 8370.45 | (malformed) | 8370.45 |
| employee contribution | 200.00 | 200.00 | (malformed) | 200.00 |
| allowed deduction | 370.62 | 370.62 | (malformed) | 370.62 |
| taxable pay | 7799.83 | 7799.83 | (malformed) | 7799.83 |
| income tax | 1267.96 | 1267.96 | (malformed) | 1267.96 |
| net pay | 6531.87 | 6531.87 | (malformed) | 6531.87 |
| clauses | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 | (malformed) | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 5 tool calls · 12.3s · $0.0018
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to see what inputs we have.
Tool
[
{"id": "9869ba945ef7380b-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="9869ba945ef7380b-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8370.45", "payroll_month": "2026-05", "allowed_deduction": "370.62"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll record: gross_pay 8370.45, payroll_month 2026-05, allowed_deduction 370.62. Now I need the reference row for 2026-05. The month is in the second half (May... wait, first-half vs second-half — need to check the boundaries). Let me look up both halves to determine which covers 2026-05. Actually, "first-half" and "second-half" of the year presumably: first half = Jan–Jun, second half = Jul–Dec. But I should look up to confirm. Let me call lookup_reference for both to be safe — they're independent calls.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
calculate(program="contribution_base = min(8370.45, 5000.00)\nemployee_contribution = round(contribution_base * 0.04, 2)\navailable = 8370.45 - employee_contribution\nallowed_deduction = min(370.62, 400.00, available)\ntaxable_pay = 8370.45 - employee_contribution - allowed_deduction\nmiddle_portion = min(taxable_pay, 3600.00) - 1000.00\nupper_portion = max(taxable_pay - 3600.00, 0)\nincome_tax = round(middle_portion * 0.10 + upper_portion * 0.24, 2)\nnet_pay = 8370.45 - employee_contribution - allowed_deduction - income_tax")The payroll month 2026-05 falls within the first-half reference row (2026-01 through 2026-06). Now I'll compute the exact figures.
Reasoning
The first-half covers months 2026-01 through 2026-06 (the "months" field shows the range endpoints: ["2026-01", "2026-06"]). The payroll month is 2026-05, which falls within 2026-01 to 2026-06, so the first-half row applies: - rate: 0.04 - cap: 5000.00 - deduction: 400.00 - free: 1000.00 - upper: 3600.00 - middle_rate: 0.10 - upper_rate: 0.24 Now compute: R3: employee contribution = 0.04 * min(8370.45, 5000.00) = 0.04 * 5000.00 = 200.00 R4: allowed_deduction = 370.62. Check: must not exceed deduction cap 400.00, nor gross pay minus rounded contribution = 8370.45 - 200.00 = 8170.45. 370.62 ≤ both, so valid. Taxable pay = 8370.45 - 200.00 - 370.62 = 7799.83. R5: income tax: - Portion up to free (1000.00): untaxed. - Portion above 1000 up to upper (3600): 3600 - 1000 = 2600 * 0.10 = 260.00 - Portion above 3600: 7799.83 - 3600 = 4199.83 * 0.24 = 1007.9592 Total tax = 260.00 + 1007.9592 = 1267.9592 → round half up to 1267.96. R6: net pay = 8370.45 - 200.00 - 370.62 - 1267.96 = 6531.87. Let me verify with calculate.
Tool
{
"results": {"contribution_base": "5000.00", "employee_contribution": "200.00", "available": "8170.45", "allowed_deduction": "370.62", "taxable_pay": "7799.83", "middle_portion": "2600.00", "upper_portion": "4199.83", "income_tax": "1267.96", "net_pay": "6531.87"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "calculate",
"currency": "LCR",
"gross_pay": "8370.45",
"employee_contribution": "200.00",
"allowed_deduction": "370.62",
"taxable_pay": "7799.83",
"income_tax": "1267.96",
"net_pay": "6531.87",
"clauses": ["R1", "R2", "R3", "R4", "R5", "R6"],
"explanation": "Payroll month 2026-05 selects the first-half reference row (2026-01 to 2026-06): rate 0.04, cap 5000.00, deduction cap 400.00, free 1000.00, upper 3600.00, middle_rate 0.10, upper_rate 0.24. Employee contribution = 0.04 \u00d7 min(8370.45, 5000.00) = 200.00 (R3). Allowed deduction 370.62 is valid: \u2264 400.00 cap and \u2264 8370.45 \u2212 200.00 = 8170.45 (R4). Taxable pay = 8370.45 \u2212 200.00 \u2212 370.62 = 7799.83. Income tax = 2600.00 \u00d7 0.10 + 4199.83 \u00d7 0.24 = 1267.9592 \u2192 1267.96 (R5, rounded per R2). Net pay = 8370.45 \u2212 200.00 \u2212 370.62 \u2212 1267.96 = 6531.87 (R6)."
}
Reasoning
All checks pass: - gross_pay present, payroll_month present, 2026-05 covered by first-half row. - No contract_gross_pay or amendment conflicts. - allowed_deduction 370.62 ≤ cap 400.00 and ≤ gross - contribution (8170.45). Valid. Results: - employee_contribution = 200.00 - allowed_deduction = 370.62 - taxable_pay = 7799.83 - income_tax = 1267.96 - net_pay = 6531.87 Citations: R1 (row selection), R2 (rounding), R3 (contribution), R4 (deduction/taxable), R5 (tax brackets), R6 (net pay). No amendment needed, so no R9.
Rollout #2 -50.0% malformed · 4 tool calls · 8.0s · $0.0013
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to see what inputs we have.
Tool
[
{"id": "9869ba945ef7380b-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="9869ba945ef7380b-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8370.45", "payroll_month": "2026-05", "allowed_deduction": "370.62"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")The record has gross_pay, payroll_month (2026-05), and an allowed_deduction. May 2026 is covered by 2026 rows. I need to determine which half's reference row applies — let me look up both halves.
Reasoning
The payroll record: - gross_pay: 8370.45 - payroll_month: 2026-05 - allowed_deduction: 370.62 Payroll month is 2026-05, which is covered by 2026 reference rows. May is in the second half (months 07-12 are second half? Let me check). Actually first-half and second-half — need to check what months each covers. Let me look up both halves to determine which applies to 2026-05. May (05) — I need to check the reference tables. Let me call lookup_reference for both halves to see.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
The payroll month 2026-05 is not covered by either reference row: the first-half row covers 2026-01 and 2026-06, and the second-half row covers 2026-07 and 2026-12. Under R7(3), a month without a reference row requires clarification and no extrapolation of a neighboring row (R4 also forbids assuming a reference row when the applicable row is absent, even though the 370.62 deduction is structurally valid against the largest reference cap of 400.00).
{"decision": "clarify", "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", "clauses": ["R1", "R7"], "explanation": "Payroll month 2026-05 has no applicable reference row: the first-half row covers only 2026-01 and 2026-06 and the second-half row covers only 2026-07 and 2026-12. Please provide a covered payroll month or an authoritative reference row for 2026-05; no payslip can be calculated without it."}
Reasoning
The reference rows: - first-half: months ["2026-01", "2026-06"], rate 0.04, cap 5000.00, deduction 400.00, free 1000.00, upper 3600.00, middle_rate 0.10, upper_rate 0.24 - second-half: months ["2026-07", "2026-12"], rate 0.04, cap 4000.00, deduction 400.00, free 1000.00, upper 3600.00, middle_rate 0.12, upper_rate 0.22 Payroll month is 2026-05. Neither row covers 2026-05! First-half covers 2026-01 and 2026-06; second-half covers 2026-07 and 2026-12. So 2026-05 has no applicable reference row. Per R7 item 3: A month without a reference row → decision "clarify", reason_code "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", citing R1 and R7. Do not extrapolate an old row. Wait — but R4 says: "When the month or applicable row is absent, accept structurally valid deductions up to the largest reference deduction cap for task validation, but do not calculate a payslip or assume a reference row." That's about validation of the deduction input, not about calculating. Since no applicable row exists for 2026-05, we must clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. The allowed_deduction of 370.62 is structurally valid (≤ 400.00, the largest reference deduction cap), but we still don't calculate. Answer: decision "clarify", reason_code "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", clauses ["R1", "R7"], with a short explanation naming the unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 10.8s · $0.0017
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to get the case inputs.
Tool
[
{"id": "9869ba945ef7380b-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="9869ba945ef7380b-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8370.45", "payroll_month": "2026-05", "allowed_deduction": "370.62"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")Reasoning
The payroll record: - gross_pay: 8370.45 - payroll_month: 2026-05 - allowed_deduction: 370.62 2026-05 is covered (only 2026 is covered). May 2026 — need to determine if it's first-half or second-half. Let me look up the reference. Typically first-half is Jan–Jun, second-half is Jul–Dec. Let me check lookup_reference.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
calculate(program="contribution = round(min(5000.00, 8370.45) * 0.04, 2)\navail = 8370.45 - contribution\ntaxable = 8370.45 - contribution - 370.62\nmiddle_portion = 3600.00 - 1000.00\nupper_portion = taxable - 3600.00\ntax = round(middle_portion * 0.10 + upper_portion * 0.24, 2)\nnet = 8370.45 - contribution - 370.62 - tax")Reasoning
The first-half covers months 2026-01 through 2026-06 (the "months" field lists ["2026-01", "2026-06"], presumably meaning the range from 2026-01 to 2026-06). 2026-05 falls within this range. Row values: - rate: 0.04 - cap: 5000.00 - deduction cap: 400.00 - free: 1000.00 - upper: 3600.00 - middle_rate: 0.10 - upper_rate: 0.24 Now compute: - Employee contribution = round(0.04 * min(5000.00, 8370.45), 2) = round(0.04 * 5000.00, 2) = 200.00 - Allowed deduction = 370.62. Check: must not exceed deduction cap 400.00 ✓, and must not exceed gross pay minus rounded contribution = 8370.45 - 200.00 = 8170.45 ✓. So 370.62 is valid. - Taxable pay = 8370.45 - 200.00 - 370.62 = 7799.83 - Income tax: - Free: 1000.00 untaxed - Portion above 1000 up to 3600: 3600 - 1000 = 2600 at 0.10 = 260.00 - Portion above 3600: 7799.83 - 3600 = 4199.83 at 0.24 = 1007.9582 → but do not round intermediate products; sum then round. - Total = 260.00 + 1007.9582 = 1267.9582 → round to 1267.96 - Net pay = 8370.45 - 200.00 - 370.62 - 1267.96 = 6531.87 Let me verify with calculate.
Tool
{
"results": {"contribution": "200.00", "avail": "8170.45", "taxable": "7799.83", "middle_portion": "2600.00", "upper_portion": "4199.83", "tax": "1267.96", "net": "6531.87"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "calculate",
"currency": "LCR",
"gross_pay": "8370.45",
"employee_contribution": "200.00",
"allowed_deduction": "370.62",
"taxable_pay": "7799.83",
"income_tax": "1267.96",
"net_pay": "6531.87",
"clauses": ["R1", "R2", "R3", "R4", "R5", "R6"],
"explanation": "Payroll month 2026-05 selects the first-half reference row (rate 0.04, cap 5000.00, deduction cap 400.00, free 1000.00, upper 3600.00, middle_rate 0.10, upper_rate 0.24). Employee contribution = 0.04 \u00d7 min(8370.45, 5000.00) = 200.00 (R3). Allowed deduction 370.62 is within the 400.00 cap and below available pay 8170.45 (R4), so taxable pay = 8370.45 \u2212 200.00 \u2212 370.62 = 7799.83. Income tax uses marginal brackets: 2600.00 \u00d7 0.10 + 4199.83 \u00d7 0.24 = 1267.9582, rounded half-up to 1267.96 (R5, R2). Net pay = 8370.45 \u2212 200.00 \u2212 370.62 \u2212 1267.96 = 6531.87 (R6)."
}
Reasoning
All checks pass: - Month 2026-05 is within first-half range (2026-01 to 2026-06), row applies. - Employee contribution: 0.04 × min(5000.00, 8370.45) = 200.00 (R3) - Allowed deduction 370.62 ≤ 400.00 cap and ≤ 8170.45 available (R4) ✓ - Taxable pay = 7799.83 (R4) - Income tax: 2600 × 0.10 + 4199.83 × 0.24 = 260.00 + 1007.9582 = 1267.9582 → 1267.96 (R5, R2) - Net pay = 6531.87 (R6) Return JSON with decision: calculate, currency LCR, all fields as two-decimal strings, clauses R1–R6. No amendment present, so no R9.