← Heatmap / GLM 5.3 Flash · Task 32
GLM 5.3 Flash · Tool use · Task 32 (Traps, month not covered)
Mean 48.9%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (97%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (-50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | (malformed) |
| reason code | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | (malformed) |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | (malformed) |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 96.7% passed · 4 tool calls · 8.5s · $0.0014
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 66.7% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to see what case inputs exist.
Tool
[
{"id": "efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "7777.07", "payroll_month": "2025-08", "allowed_deduction": "12.47"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-08. The rules say only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Let me confirm by checking the reference tables.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2025-08 has no applicable reference row: both reference halves cover only 2026 (2026-01 through 2026-12). Under R1 only 2026 is covered, and R7 requires clarification for a month without a reference row rather than extrapolating an old row. Please supply a payroll month within 2026 (or the missing reference coverage) so the payslip can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-08, which is outside 2026. The reference rows only cover 2026-01 through 2026-12. Per R7 item 3: "A month without a reference row: return decision: 'clarify' and reason_code: 'NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE', citing R1 and R7. Do not extrapolate an old row." So the answer is clarify with reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. No monetary fields should be returned.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 8.4s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents and getting the reference tables.
Tool
[
{"id": "efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll")Reasoning
Now read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "7777.07", "payroll_month": "2025-08", "allowed_deduction": "12.47"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month is 2025-08, but only 2026 months are covered by the reference rows (R1). No applicable reference row exists for 2025-08, so no payslip can be calculated and no old row may be extrapolated (R7). Please provide a payroll month within 2026 or an applicable reference schedule to proceed."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-08. Only 2026 is covered. So this is a month without a reference row → clarify with reason_code "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", citing R1 and R7. Per R7 item 3: "A month without a reference row: return decision: 'clarify' and reason_code: 'NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE', citing R1 and R7. Do not extrapolate an old row." Also R4 says: "When the month or applicable row is absent, accept structurally valid deductions up to the largest reference deduction cap for task validation, but do not calculate a payslip or assume a reference row." That's about accepting the deduction value for validation, not calculating. So the answer: clarify, NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses R1, R7. No monetary fields. Missing required values include explicit null — but here gross_pay is present; it's the month that lacks a reference row. The fields allowed for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses, optional explanation. Should I include null fields? The rule says "Missing required values include explicit null." Here gross_pay is present, so no nulls needed. Do not return calculated monetary fields. Output one JSON object without Markdown fences.
Rollout #3 -50.0% malformed · 4 tool calls · 7.2s · $0.0011
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to get the case inputs.
Tool
[
{"id": "efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "7777.07", "payroll_month": "2025-08", "allowed_deduction": "12.47"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-08. According to R1, only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. Let me check the reference tables to confirm. The rules say "Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." But I should still check lookup_reference to confirm there's no applicable row for 2025-08. The lookup_reference tool has first-half and second-half. Let me look at both to see the covered months. Actually, the rule says only 2026 is covered, but I should verify via lookup_reference. Let me call both lookups in parallel since they're independent.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
The payroll month is 2025-08, but both reference rows cover only 2026 (first-half: 2026-01–2026-06; second-half: 2026-07–2026-12). Under R7, a month without a reference row requires clarification and must not be extrapolated from an old row.
{"decision": "clarify", "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", "clauses": ["R1", "R7"], "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-08 has no applicable reference row (reference tables cover only 2026-01 through 2026-12), so no payslip can be calculated. Please supply a payroll month within 2026 or an applicable reference row."}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-08. The reference rows only cover 2026-01 through 2026-12. There is no reference row for 2025-08. Per R7 item 3: "A month without a reference row: return decision: 'clarify' and reason_code: 'NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE', citing R1 and R7. Do not extrapolate an old row." So the answer is a clarify decision with reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. The allowed fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. An optional explanation string is permitted. Do not include calculated monetary fields. The explanation should be short, naming the unresolved blocker. The blocker: payroll month 2025-08 has no reference row (only 2026 is covered).