← Heatmap / GLM 5.3 Flash · Task 45
GLM 5.3 Flash · Tool use · Task 45 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 0.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (-50%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (-50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | (malformed) | clarify | (malformed) |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | (malformed) | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | (malformed) |
| clauses | R1 R7 | (malformed) | R1 R7 | (malformed) |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 -50.0% malformed · 2 tool calls · 4.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents and looking up the reference tables. Actually, I should first list documents to see what's in the case, and also I need to know the payroll month before looking up the reference. But the reference lookup requires knowing whether it's first-half or second-half, which depends on the payroll month. So first, list documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "f46dc79c607d7411-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="f46dc79c607d7411-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (6072.36) and allowed_deduction (307.83) but omits payroll_month entirely. Under R1, payroll_month is a required field and the reference row is selected by payroll month; without it no applicable reference row can be determined, so no payslip can be calculated. Please provide the payroll month (YYYY-MM) so the correct first-half or second-half reference row can be selected."
}
```
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay "6072.36" and allowed_deduction "307.83", but no payroll_month. Per R7 step 2: Missing payroll_month → decision "clarify", reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. No monetary fields should be returned for clarification cases. The reason should name the unresolved blocker: payroll_month is missing, so no reference row can be selected. Let me double check: the record has gross_pay present, so not MISSING_GROSS_PAY. payroll_month missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Cite R1 and R7. No need for lookup_reference since we can't determine the month. The answer is a clarify JSON.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 6.1s · $0.0011
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to get the case inputs.
Tool
[
{"id": "f46dc79c607d7411-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="f46dc79c607d7411-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
calculate(program="check = 1")Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay = 6072.36 and allowed_deduction = 307.83, but there's no payroll_month. Per R7, missing payroll_month requires clarification with reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. Wait, let me double-check the record. It only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month field. So R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay — no, gross_pay present. 2. Missing payroll_month — yes, missing. Return clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. The answer fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation string. Do not include calculated monetary fields.
Tool
{
"results": {"check": "1"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (6072.36) and allowed_deduction (307.83) but no payroll_month. R1 requires a payroll month in YYYY-MM format to select the applicable reference row, and R7 step 2 mandates clarification with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH when payroll_month is missing. Please provide the payroll month so the correct reference row can be selected and the payslip calculated."
}
Reasoning
The record is missing payroll_month. Per R7 step 2, return decision "clarify", reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. No monetary fields should be returned for clarification cases.
Rollout #3 -50.0% malformed · 4 tool calls · 4.0s · $0.0010
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents and getting the reference rows.
Tool
[
{"id": "f46dc79c607d7411-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.07",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="f46dc79c607d7411-payroll")Reasoning
Now let me read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (6072.36 LCR) and allowed_deduction (307.83 LCR) but omits payroll_month. A payroll month in YYYY-MM form is required to select the applicable reference row (contribution rate/cap, deduction cap, and tax brackets), and only 2026 months are covered. Please provide the payroll month so the calculation can proceed; do not infer it from document dates or assumptions."
}
```
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay "6072.36" and allowed_deduction "307.83", but no payroll_month. Let me check the document again — the record only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month field.
Per R7:
1. Missing gross_pay — no, gross_pay is present.
2. Missing payroll_month — yes, payroll_month is missing. Return decision: "clarify", reason_code: "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7.
Wait, let me double-check the document. The record is {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}}. No payroll_month, no contract_gross_pay, no amendment.
So the answer is clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7.
For clarification include a short explanation naming the unresolved blocker and asking for its resolution.
Fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation. No monetary fields.
Money must be strings with two decimals — but clarify doesn't include monetary fields. Good.
Return one JSON object without Markdown fences.