← Heatmap / GLM 5.3 Flash · Task 102
GLM 5.3 Flash · Tool use · Task 102 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 48.9%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (-50%) | Rollout #3 (97%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | (malformed) | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | (malformed) | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | (malformed) | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 6.3s · $0.0011
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to see what inputs we have.
Tool
[
{"id": "dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5370.93", "allowed_deduction": "379.49"}
}
Assistant
calculate(program="gross = 5370.93\ndeduction = 379.49")Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay = 5370.93 and allowed_deduction = 379.49, but no payroll_month. According to R7, missing payroll_month requires clarification with reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. Wait, let me check the order of checks: 1. Missing gross_pay → MISSING_GROSS_PAY 2. Missing payroll_month → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH 3. Month without reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE 4. Conflicting gross_pay → CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY Gross pay is present (5370.93). Payroll month is missing. So decision: clarify, reason_code: MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. The record has no payroll_month field at all. Also no contract_gross_pay or amendment. So the answer is clarify. Fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses, and optional explanation. Money fields should not be returned for clarification cases.
Tool
{
"results": {"gross": "5370.93", "deduction": "379.49"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (5370.93) and allowed_deduction (379.49) but no payroll_month. R1 requires a payroll month in YYYY-MM format to select the applicable reference row, and R7 requires clarification when payroll_month is missing. Please provide the payroll month so the correct reference row can be selected and the payslip calculated."
}
Reasoning
The record is missing payroll_month entirely. Per R7 check order: gross_pay is present, so check 1 passes. Check 2: payroll_month is missing → clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. No calculated monetary fields should be returned.
Rollout #2 -50.0% malformed · 4 tool calls · 6.5s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 0.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to get the case inputs.
Tool
[
{"id": "dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5370.93", "allowed_deduction": "379.49"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay "5370.93" and allowed_deduction "379.49", but no payroll_month. Let me check the reference tables — but first, the missing payroll_month is a blocker. Wait, per R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → no, gross_pay is present. 2. Missing payroll_month → yes, missing. Return clarify with reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. But should I check the reference tables first? The record has no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. The clarification order says check missing payroll_month as item 2. There's no month to look up. So the answer is clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Fields for clarify: decision, reason_code, clauses. Optional explanation. Do not include calculated monetary fields. Citations: R1 and R7.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.06",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
The payroll record supplies `gross_pay` (5370.93) and `allowed_deduction` (379.49), but no `payroll_month`. Without a month, no reference row can be selected (both halves of 2026 require a specific month), so per R7's ordered checks the missing month blocks calculation before any reference selection or payslip computation.
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record is missing payroll_month, which R1 requires (format YYYY-MM). Please provide the payroll month so the applicable reference row can be selected and the payslip calculated."
}
```
Reasoning
The record has gross_pay "5370.93" and allowed_deduction "379.49" but no payroll_month. Per R7 order of checks: 1. Missing gross_pay — present, OK. 2. Missing payroll_month — missing → clarify with reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. I cannot select a reference row without a month, so no payslip calculation. Return the clarify JSON.
Rollout #3 96.7% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.7s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 66.7% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents to see what inputs we have.
Tool
[
{"id": "dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5370.93", "allowed_deduction": "379.49"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay (5370.93) and allowed_deduction (379.49) but no payroll_month. A reference row cannot be selected without the month, so no payslip can be calculated. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (a 2026 month is required for a reference row to exist)."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay = 5370.93 and allowed_deduction = 379.49, but no payroll_month. Let me check the record again — it has "gross_pay" and "allowed_deduction" only. No payroll_month field. Per R7: Missing payroll_month → clarify with reason_code "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", citing R1 and R7. Wait, but let me double-check the document — maybe there's more. The record shows only gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month, no amendment, no contract_gross_pay. Order of checks in R7: 1. Missing gross_pay — present, so no. 2. Missing payroll_month — missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. For clarification, no calculated monetary fields. Missing required values include explicit null — but the allowed answer fields for clarify are decision, reason_code, clauses, plus optional explanation. So I return decision: "clarify", reason_code: "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH", clauses: ["R1", "R7"], and a short explanation. I don't need lookup_reference or calculate since we can't proceed without the month.