Luma Payroll Gym
← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 32
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Single-turn · Task 32 (Traps, month not covered) Mean 98.9%
Field Expected Rollout #1 (100%) Rollout #2 (97%) Rollout #3 (100%)
decision clarify clarify clarify clarify
reason code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE
clauses R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "7777.07", "payroll_month": "2025-08", "allowed_deduction": "12.47"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.07", "cap": "4000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3300.00", "middle_rate": "0.08", "upper_rate": "0.24"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1000.00", "upper": "3600.00", "middle_rate": "0.08", "upper_rate": "0.18"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4.6s · $0.0003
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll month 2025-08 has no applicable reference row; provide a payroll month covered by the rulebook or an applicable reference schedule."
}
Rollout #2 96.7% passed · 6.6s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 66.7% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll month 2025-08 is outside the covered 2026 reference periods. Provide a payroll month covered by an applicable reference row."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying output requirements**

I need to ensure that there are no references to months beyond 2025 in the output. I should focus on the exact fields that need decision-related reasons, including optional explanations and any applicable naming conventions. It's also crucial to clarify any blockers that might be present so I can ask for a resolution. I should cite references R1 and R7 and ensure that the output is in JSON format only.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3.1s · $0.0003
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll month 2025-08 is outside the covered 2026 reference periods. Please provide a covered payroll month or an applicable reference row."
}