← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 88
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Single-turn · Task 88 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "2924.24", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "4500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3000.00", "middle_rate": "0.08", "upper_rate": "0.24"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.06", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3300.00", "middle_rate": "0.10", "upper_rate": "0.18"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4.1s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month is missing, so the applicable reference row cannot be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying payroll details** I need to address the missing payroll month. Since we have the gross order but not the month, I need to clarify this point. I should also check the exact allowed fields in the JSON format to understand if there are any optional clauses, especially around the reason code. Plus, it seems I should mention any blockers that may require resolution. It’s important to get these details right to move forward!
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 5.6s · $0.0002
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing, so the applicable reference row cannot be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying payroll details** I need to address some missing details related to payroll. The order states that the "gross first" is present, but there's a missing "payroll_month." So, I need to clarify that. It also seems like I should confirm the exact fields needed in the JSON format and check if any additional optional explanations are necessary, including reasons for any decision clauses. I should mention that there's a blockage and ask for a resolution on this.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3.6s · $0.0002
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month is missing, so the applicable reference row cannot be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying payroll details** I need to clarify that the payroll_month is missing. I’m uncertain about the priority—should I focus on the missing gross amount or just the month? Maybe I should check the exact fields in the JSON. An explanation might be optional, but it’s important to keep the naming concise to avoid any blockers. Asking for resolution on this will help us move forward!