← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 12
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 12 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 10.2s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "20c5003e680b942a-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="20c5003e680b942a-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5796.92", "allowed_deduction": "0.00"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing, so the applicable 2026 reference row cannot be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing month information** I need to clarify the missing month for the order. Since it's absent, I don't need to look anything up. I should decide on the exact fields for the JSON, especially the reason_code clauses and any optional explanation. It's important to mention the blocker so I can ask for a resolution. This way, the user has all the details needed to address the issue effectively. Let's move forward!
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.9s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "20c5003e680b942a-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="20c5003e680b942a-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5796.92", "allowed_deduction": "0.00"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month is missing. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Checking on payroll issues** I need to address the issue of the missing payroll month. First, I'll confirm if I can check the order for that specific period before doing a reference lookup. The user mentions that a reference is available but that I still need clarification on the R7 missing month. I must prepare a return JSON with citations R1 and R7, while providing a concise explanation that names the blocker and asks for a resolution. I won't need to do an extensive lookup, which is nice!
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "20c5003e680b942a-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="20c5003e680b942a-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5796.92", "allowed_deduction": "0.00"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month is missing; provide the YYYY-MM payroll month so the applicable reference row can be selected."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying inputs for lookup** I need to clarify the missing month before proceeding with the lookup. The inputs are in the wrong order, as gross information is present but the month is not. There's no need to reference anything additional here. I must ensure the fields are in the correct JSON format and that I include optional explanation clauses. It's essential to provide a brief explanation about what's blocking the process and ask for the necessary resolution.