← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 13
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 13 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "6232153c41519a05-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="6232153c41519a05-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-02"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-02."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing gross order** I'm noticing that the order indicates there's a missing gross, but it seems like the user thinks I need to look that up. However, I should clarify that before I move forward with calculations. I need to return a clarification and cite references R1 and R7 in my explanation. It sounds like I should keep it short while addressing the blocker and asking for resolution, specifically regarding fields, decision, and reason_code clauses.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.1s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "6232153c41519a05-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="6232153c41519a05-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-02"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-02."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying gross issues** It looks like we have some missing gross information related to R7 and the month/reference. I need to clarify if there’s no need for a lookup since the user mentioned the reference is only available through lookup. However, since there's a blocker in the way, maybe a lookup isn’t necessary after all. I need to ensure we're using JSON with the exact fields for decision-making, including the reason code clauses and optional explanations. I'll also mention the unresolved blocker and ask for a resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.2s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "6232153c41519a05-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="6232153c41519a05-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-02"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-02."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying information needed** I need to address a missing gross detail because the order specifies that I should clarify this immediately. However, the user mentions that there’s a reference available, and perhaps I don’t need to pursue it further. I need to pinpoint the exact fields to clarify, and I should cite the relevant clauses. An explanation is optional, but I should keep it short and specifically name the blocker when asking for a resolution. I’ll elaborate in JSON only.