← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 26
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 26 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.8s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "212615d32af28990-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="212615d32af28990-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not include gross_pay. Please provide the employee's gross pay for 2026-09."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing gross details** I'm trying to sort through some confusion about missing gross information. The instructions say to retrieve references, but it seems like we should focus on the missing gross first without unnecessary lookups. I need to clarify the exact fields in the JSON, including the decision, reason codes, and any optional explanations. There’s also a request to address the name blocker for resolution. Let’s make sure we get this all straightened out!
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.0s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "212615d32af28990-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="212615d32af28990-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-09."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying inputs for lookup** I see that we're missing some gross information, so it looks like I need to order a check before proceeding with the lookup. It seems like I should clarify the missing gross data and maybe cite R1 and R7 for context. I also need to think about the decision fields, specifically regarding reason_code clauses and any optional explanations that might be useful. It’s important to get this right for accurate results!
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.1s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "212615d32af28990-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="212615d32af28990-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing; provide gross_pay to resolve this blocker."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing gross information** I need to clarify a situation regarding the missing gross—which seems to relate to a specific order's requirement about having this information before the month. There's no need for additional look-up; I should focus on understanding the exact JSON fields connected to this decision. It’s essential to think about the reason code and consider any optional explanation that might help clarify this situation further. I want to ensure I'm addressing everything correctly!