← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 48
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 48 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.7s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The gross pay is missing. Please provide gross_pay for payroll month 2026-09."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying order requirements** I need to address a missing gross amount in the order, which says to clarify before looking up. The order seems to indicate that I should retrieve reference rows. The user mentions a lookup but it doesn't address the missing gross. Instructions say to retrieve case inputs, but missing gross might require me to specify exact fields. I think I should keep the explanation short and focus on clauses R1 and R7 to ensure clarity.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-09."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying requirements** I realize that I need to address the missing gross data first in the order. There’s no need to look it up. I should return the exact fields for clarification, ensuring they’re named correctly. Although an explanation is optional, I think I might still include a brief one that names the blocker and asks for a resolution. I’ll focus on providing the information in JSON format only.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-09."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying output requirements** I need to address the missing gross and clarify the order before referencing anything. It seems that I shouldn't need to look this up. My goal is to ensure that the outputs include the exact fields and clarify decisions, reasons, and any optional clauses. I must mention any blockers and request resolutions to keep everything clear. Also, I should stick to using JSON format only.