← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 67
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 67 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "cc74d2a8fe768d29-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="cc74d2a8fe768d29-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8261.80", "allowed_deduction": "143.37"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing. Please provide the calendar month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying details before lookup** I need to clarify the missing month before doing any lookup. It seems important to establish the rule order regarding the missing month. I might consider that retrieval reference isn't necessary, but I should be clear about the exact fields in the JSON decision. Also, I should include mentions of the blocker and how to resolve it. It'll make my response more comprehensive and effective!
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.3s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "cc74d2a8fe768d29-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="cc74d2a8fe768d29-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8261.80", "allowed_deduction": "143.37"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing. Please provide the calendar month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing payroll month** I realize I need to find the missing month before the reference. The user mentioned that the reference is only accessible through lookup, but it seems I don't actually need it due to the missing month. It might be best to just retrieve the necessary inputs while clarifying the situation briefly. I should name the blocker and ask for a resolution, focusing on clauses R1 and R7 and discussing the optional explanation regarding the JSON fields.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "cc74d2a8fe768d29-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="cc74d2a8fe768d29-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8261.80", "allowed_deduction": "143.37"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing. Provide the calendar month in YYYY-MM format so the applicable reference row can be selected."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing info** I need to address the issue of a missing month in the context of an order that includes gross data. I’m thinking that perhaps there’s no need for a lookup; I might just need the reference rows. Since there’s a missing month and R7 indicates a payroll issue, I need to figure out the exact fields to focus on. I could provide a short explanation, mainly centered around naming the blocker and asking for a resolution, likely regarding clauses like R1 and R7.