← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 77
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 77 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The gross_pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-12."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing gross** I’m noticing confusion about the missing gross. The order specifies to look for missing gross first, and I don't think I need to do a lookup. The user mentioned that reference rows are available only through a lookup, so maybe I should retrieve those inputs. I need to clarify what is meant by missing gross and reference rows R1 and R7. Also, determining the fields and the reason code clauses will be needed for an explanation.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 7.7s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
**Planning tool usage** I need to make sure I use the tools effectively. First, I'll gather all the relevant documentation. Then, I'll look into whether multiple actions can be performed in parallel. It seems important to retrieve the cases and reference the appropriate rows, so I plan to list those out. I'll ensure everything is well-organized and that I'm using the tools in the best possible way for efficiency.
Tool
[
{"id": "2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-12."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying requirements** I need to determine the missing gross first before proceeding with any deductions. It's important to clarify what specific fields are necessary, and I should stick to using JSON format only. An explanation is optional, but it could be helpful to include a short note naming the blocker and asking for a resolution. I want to ensure everything is precise and clear to avoid misunderstandings. Let’s make this as straightforward as possible!
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.1s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="2f3aef65d960ef03-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-12", "allowed_deduction": "354.30"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Gross pay is missing. Please provide the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-12."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying missing gross information** I see there's a mention of missing gross details, and the order specifies that I need to address this first without needing to look anything up. I should clarify which exact fields are missing. A short explanation could be useful, naming the blocker and asking for a resolution. It looks like there might be clauses such as "R1" or "R7" involved. I’ll be sure to stick to JSON format only.