← Heatmap / GPT 5.6 Luna · Task 79
GPT 5.6 Luna* · Tool use · Task 79 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.2s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "3306732e853a7389-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="3306732e853a7389-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "2524.56", "allowed_deduction": "208.50"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing. Provide the calendar month in YYYY-MM format so the applicable reference row can be selected."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying payroll details** Okay, it seems like there's a missing month for the R7 order regarding payroll. I need to clarify this before doing any lookups. We don’t need to reference anything else; I just need to understand which specific fields need attention in the JSON format. Additionally, it might be useful to mention any blockers and ask about the resolution for this issue. Just want to ensure everything's clear and organized!
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.8s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "3306732e853a7389-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="3306732e853a7389-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "2524.56", "allowed_deduction": "208.50"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing, so the applicable 2026 reference row cannot be selected. Provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}
Reasoning
**Clarifying payroll issues** I need to check for a missing month and verify that the gross exists in the order. If the user only mentions references available in the lookup, I need to clarify that the missing month rule takes precedence. I should figure out the exact JSON fields required, including any optional explanation for the decision and reasons behind it. I’ll also have to mention any blockers and ask for a resolution on this.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Tool
[
{"id": "3306732e853a7389-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="3306732e853a7389-payroll")Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "2524.56", "allowed_deduction": "208.50"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll_month is missing. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format."
}