Luma Payroll Gym
← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 32
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Single-turn · Task 32 (Traps, month not covered) Mean 100.0%
Field Expected Rollout #1 (100%) Rollout #2 (100%) Rollout #3 (100%)
decision clarify clarify clarify clarify
reason code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE
clauses R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"efa5f8e964c98c5c-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "7777.07", "payroll_month": "2025-08", "allowed_deduction": "12.47"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.07", "cap": "4000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3300.00", "middle_rate": "0.08", "upper_rate": "0.24"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1000.00", "upper": "3600.00", "middle_rate": "0.08", "upper_rate": "0.18"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 11.2s · $0.0006
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-08 is outside the 2026 periods covered by a reference row, so no row applies. Please supply a payroll month covered by the rulebook's reference schedule.",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"]
}
Reasoning
2025-08 is outside 2026 → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE (dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7). Actually rule 3: month without a reference row. R1 says only 2026 covered; dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE? The order: missing gross, missing month, month without reference row. 2025-08 has no reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7.

But "Missing or out-of-range dates cite R1 and R7." Yes.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 10.5s · $0.0006
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-08 falls outside the only covered year (2026), so no reference row applies. Please provide a payroll month within 2026 (or a covered month) to proceed."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month 2025-08 is outside 2026 → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE (R1 covers only 2026). R7 order: gross_pay present, month present, month without reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.

Missing/out-of-range dates cite R1 and R7.

Note: R4 says when month or applicable row absent, accept deductions up to 350.00 but do not calculate. But clarification rule3 applies here since month has no reference row. Return clarify.

Reason code: NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 14.5s · $0.0003
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-08 falls outside the only covered year (2026), so no reference row applies; please provide a payroll month within 2026."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month 2025-08 is outside 2026. R1: only 2026 covered; dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. R7 order: 1. gross_pay present 2. payroll_month present 3. month without reference row -> NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Hmm, but "Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." The reason code — R7 case 3 is "A month without a reference row" -> NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. 2025-08 has no reference row. Also missing/out-of-range dates cite R1 and R7. So decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses R1, R7. Actually out-of-range dates — reason code? R7 list has only four. The month has no reference row. Use NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.