Luma Payroll Gym
← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 44
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Single-turn · Task 44 (Traps, month not covered) Mean 98.9%
Field Expected Rollout #1 (100%) Rollout #2 (100%) Rollout #3 (97%)
decision clarify clarify clarify clarify
reason code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE
clauses R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"93c6cd218be71e1f-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "2246.04", "payroll_month": "2025-07", "allowed_deduction": "103.13"}}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1200.00", "upper": "3600.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.18"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.08", "cap": "3500.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "2800.00", "middle_rate": "0.12", "upper_rate": "0.24"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 8.2s · $0.0005
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-07 falls outside the covered 2026 reference periods, so no reference row applies; please provide a payroll month within 2026."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month 2025-07 is outside 2026 → R7 clarification. Which reason code? "A month without a reference row: NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE", citing R1 and R7. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. The schedule only has first-half/second-half for 2026 periods. So NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.

Decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses R1, R7.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 7.8s · $0.0003
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-07 has no applicable reference row because the rulebook covers only 2026; please supply a payroll month within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2025-07. Rules only cover 2026. So NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, cite R1 and R7. Wait, R7 order: month without reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. The case schedule covers first-half/second-half of 2026 presumably. 2025-07 is outside 2026, dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So clarify, reason NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.

Actually is the schedule bound to 2026? Yes, meanings and period boundaries stay the same, only 2026 covered. So NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.
Rollout #3 96.7% passed · 10.2s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 66.7% R1 R7
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2025-07 is outside the covered year 2026, so no reference row applies. Please resolve by supplying a payroll month covered by a reference row."
}
Reasoning
Month 2025-07 is outside 2026 → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE per R7/R1. Order: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, then month without reference row. So reason NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.

Note date out of range says "Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." Clause 3 covers month without reference row. Missing or out-of-range dates cite R1 and R7. So clauses R1, R7.