← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 93
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Single-turn · Task 93 (Traps, conflicting pay (draft amendment))
Mean 50.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (-50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | (malformed) |
| reason code | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY | (malformed) |
| clauses | R7 R9 | R7 R9 | R7 R9 | (malformed) |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Source documents: {"dda2224f461b6dac-payroll": {"kind": "payroll", "record": {"gross_pay": "3418.55", "payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "361.73"}}, "dda2224f461b6dac-contract": {"kind": "contract", "gross_pay": "3518.55"}, "dda2224f461b6dac-amendment": {"kind": "amendment", "gross_pay": "3418.55", "effective_month": "2026-10", "approved": false}}
Authoritative case reference schedule: {"first-half": {"rate": "0.05", "cap": "4000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "3000.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.18"}, "second-half": {"rate": "0.04", "cap": "4000.00", "deduction": "400.00", "free": "1100.00", "upper": "2800.00", "middle_rate": "0.14", "upper_rate": "0.22"}}
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 8.7s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "The payroll record gross_pay (3418.55) differs from contract gross_pay (3518.55), and the only amendment is not approved, so the conflict is unresolved. Please provide an approved amendment resolving the gross pay conflict or confirm the correct gross pay."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month 2026-10 -> second-half. Gross pay 3418.55. Contract3518.55 differs -> conflict. Amendment is not approved (draft) -> doesn't resolve. So clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, cite R7 and R9. Order of checks: missing gross, missing month, no reference, conflicting gross. So conflict check applies. But also allowed_deduction 361.73 exceeds... cap is 400.00 here, so fine. But we must clarify. Clauses: R7, R9.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 10.3s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "Blocker: the contract gross pay 3518.55 conflicts with the payroll gross pay 3418.55, and the amendment is not approved, so it cannot resolve the conflict. Please supply an approved amendment effective no later than 2026-10 with amount 3418.55, or confirm the correct gross pay."
}
Reasoning
Gross pay 3418.55, month 2026-10 -> second-half. Contract gross 3518.55 differs from3418.55. Amendment is not approved (approved: false), so does not resolve conflict. Per R7 step 4: CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, cite R7 and R9. Need to check order: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, reference row exists (second-half for 2026-10), then conflict. So clarification. Reason code CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY. Explanation naming blocker and asking resolution.
Rollout #3 -50.0% malformed · 6.0s · $0.0002
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 0.0% | R7 R9 |
| exact | 0.0% | R7 R9 |
| field accuracy | 0.0% | R7 R9 |
| citations | 0.0% | R7 R9 |
Assistant
```json
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
"explanation": "Unresolved blocker: the payroll record gross_pay 3418.55 differs from the contract gross_pay 3518.55, and the amendment is not approved (approved: false), so it does not resolve the conflict. Please supply an approved amendment effective no later than 2026-10 whose amount matches the payroll record gross pay, or otherwise resolve the conflicting gross pay amounts."
}
```
Reasoning
Payroll month 2026-10 → second-half row. Gross pay 3418.55. Contract 3518.55 differs from gross pay. Amendment approved=false → does not resolve. So conflicting gross pay → clarify, reason CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, cite R7 and R9. Order of checks: 1 missing gross, 2 missing month, 3 no reference row, 4 conflict. So conflict is checked. Reference row exists (2026-10 second-half). So clarification. Return clarify with reason_code CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R7","R9"], explanation naming blocker.