← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 2
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 2 (Traps, month not covered)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE | NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 14.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8177.17", "payroll_month": "2027-09", "allowed_deduction": "213.78"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Payroll month 2027-09 is outside 2026 and has no applicable reference row; please provide a payroll month covered by a reference row."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month 2027-09 is outside 2026. R1: "Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." R7 check order: 3. A month without a reference row: NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. Cite R1 and R7. Gross pay present, payroll month present. Month without reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 16.8s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let's start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8177.17", "payroll_month": "2027-09", "allowed_deduction": "213.78"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "Payroll month 2027-09 falls outside the covered year 2026, so no reference row applies and the payroll cannot be calculated. Please provide a payroll month within 2026."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month is 2027-09, outside 2026. R1: "Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." R7 item 3: "A month without a reference row: return decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Do not extrapolate an old row." Missing gross_pay check first: gross_pay present. Missing payroll_month: present. Month without reference row: 2027-09 is not covered → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. So clarify with reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses R1, R7. Short explanation naming blocker and asking for resolution. Should I call lookup_reference? The month is outside 2026; reference rows are first-half/second-half. Not necessary — but the rules say reference selection is by payroll month, and only 2026 is covered. I could verify but it's not needed. The answer fields: decision, reason_code, clauses, optional explanation.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 26.2s · $0.0012
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="0e275114d03c4bdf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "8177.17", "payroll_month": "2027-09", "allowed_deduction": "213.78"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Payroll month is 2027-09, outside 2026. Per R1: "Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." R7 item 3: "A month without a reference row: return decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7." Wait, but the order of checks: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, then month without reference row. 2027-09 has no reference row (only 2026 covered). So NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Should I still lookup reference? The reference rows are first-half/second-half with effective months presumably in 2026. The month 2027-09 has no applicable reference row. I could verify via lookup_reference, but the rules say only 2026 is covered. Let me check lookup_reference anyway to confirm effective months — but not strictly necessary. The check order requires NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE for a month without a reference row. The rules say "Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." Which reason code? R7 list: 3 is "A month without a reference row" → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. The reference rows cover 2026 only, so 2027-09 has no applicable row. That's the appropriate code. R1 also mentions out-of-range dates citing R1 and R7. Let me quickly check lookup_reference to confirm effective months.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll month 2027-09 falls outside 2026 and no reference row covers it (first-half covers 2026-01 to 2026-06, second-half covers 2026-07 to 2026-12). Please provide a payroll month within 2026 so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll month is 2027-09, outside2026 (reference rows cover 2026-01 to 2026-06 and 2026-07 to 2026-12). No applicable reference row. Per R7 order: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, then month without a reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7. Also R1 says dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. So reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE fits item 3: "A month without a reference row". Cite R1 and R7. Return clarify JSON with explanation naming the blocker.