← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 13
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 13 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 15.4s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "6232153c41519a05-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="6232153c41519a05-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-02"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-02 has no gross_pay (a required value). Please provide the gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has only payroll_month: "2026-02". No gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay (explicit null? It's absent entirely - "Missing required values include explicit null"). gross_pay is missing → MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Wait, but is gross_pay missing or is it in another document? Only one document. So gross_pay is missing. But hold on — maybe there's a contract_gross_pay? No. So clarify. But wait, should I still check reference? Order: gross_pay first. So return clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. No monetary fields. Clauses: ["R1", "R7"].
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 15.8s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "6232153c41519a05-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="6232153c41519a05-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-02"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-02 has no gross_pay value; please supply the gross pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-02" but no gross_pay. Per R7, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, cite R1 and R7. gross_pay is missing (absent). Explicit null counts too but here it's simply absent. So return clarify with reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1", "R7"]. But wait — should I still look up the reference? Not necessary; the first check fails. R7 says "Before calculation, check required and conflicting inputs in this order" — item 1 is missing gross_pay. So answer immediately. The month 2026-02 is within 2026 and would have a first-half reference row. But since gross_pay is missing, the answer is clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Explanation: short explanation naming the unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 13.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "6232153c41519a05-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="6232153c41519a05-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-02"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-02 does not include gross_pay, which is required. Please provide the gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record only has payroll_month: "2026-02". No gross_pay. Per R7, missing gross_pay (including explicit null or absent) → clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. Yes, gross_pay is missing. So clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. Do not return calculated monetary fields. Explanation: short explanation naming the unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.