← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 14
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 14 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 23.2s · $0.0008
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing the documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "e83ea8e208903b54-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="e83ea8e208903b54-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "345.85"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-01 and allowed_deduction 345.85, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Wait, but let me check - maybe there are other documents? Only one document listed. gross_pay is missing (explicitly absent, not even null). R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Should I still look up the reference? Not necessary for the answer but the deduction check... R4 says when month or applicable row is absent, accept structurally valid deductions up to largest cap. But here we have a month with a row likely. However, the missing gross_pay check comes first in R7's order. So return clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Clauses: R1 and R7. Explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.06",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "2800.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "900.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 does not include gross_pay, a required value under R1. Please provide the gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record for 2026-01 has no gross_pay field. Per R7 step 1, missing gross_pay (required value absent) → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. The month 2026-01 has a reference row (first-half covers 2026-01), but the check order puts missing gross_pay first.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 13.2s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "e83ea8e208903b54-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="e83ea8e208903b54-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "345.85"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 does not include a gross_pay value. Please provide gross_pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-01" and allowed_deduction "345.85", but no gross_pay. Per R7, missing gross_pay (explicit null or absent) → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Wait — gross_pay is missing entirely. R7 check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. There is no contract_gross_pay or amendment document. Only one document. So decision: clarify, reason_code: MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses: ["R1", "R7"]. But wait, should I check the reference row first? R7 order says missing gross_pay is checked first. Also no need to lookup reference since clarification for missing gross pay takes precedence. The order: check required and conflicting inputs in this order. Missing gross_pay is #1. So return clarify. Fields: decision, reason_code, clauses, explanation. No monetary fields.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 16.8s · $0.0007
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "e83ea8e208903b54-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="e83ea8e208903b54-payroll")Reasoning
Read the document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "345.85"}
}
Assistant
calculate(program="gross_present = 0")Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-01" and allowed_deduction "345.85", but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Wait — check for contract_gross_pay? The record only shows payroll_month and allowed_deduction. Missing gross_pay is explicit absence (not null, just missing). R7 item 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. No lookup needed since clarification is ordered first. But maybe I should check reference anyway? Order of checks: missing gross_pay is first. So clarify.
Tool
{
"results": {"gross_present": "0"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 contains no gross_pay value; please supply the required gross_pay so payroll can be calculated.",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"]
}
Reasoning
Gross pay is missing entirely from the record. Per R7 check order 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. No monetary fields.