Luma Payroll Gym
← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 26
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 26 (Traps, missing gross pay) Mean 100.0%
Field Expected Rollout #1 (100%) Rollout #2 (100%) Rollout #3 (100%)
decision clarify clarify clarify clarify
reason code MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY
clauses R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 12.2s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
  {"id": "212615d32af28990-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="212615d32af28990-payroll")
Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record omits the required gross_pay value. Please supply gross_pay for payroll month 2026-09 so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has only payroll_month: "2026-09". gross_pay is missing (explicitly absent). Per R7 item 1: missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.

Wait, but should I check the reference first? R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify. So we return MISSING_GROSS_PAY.

But let me also check if there are other documents? Only one. The month2026-09 is in 2026, second-half presumably. But gross_pay is missing, which is checked first.

Return clarify JSON.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 10.7s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning
Let's start by listing documents.
Tool
[
  {"id": "212615d32af28990-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="212615d32af28990-payroll")
Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-09 has no gross_pay value. Please supply the monthly gross pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-09" but no gross_pay. Per R7 check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, cite R1 and R7.

gross_pay is missing (absent). So return clarify with reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1","R7"].

Do not return calculated monetary fields. Include explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 16.9s · $0.0006
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning
Let's start by listing documents.
Tool
[
  {"id": "212615d32af28990-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="212615d32af28990-payroll")
Reasoning
Read the document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="second-half")
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-09 but no gross_pay (missing). R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.

Check: gross_pay is missing (not present, but "Missing required values include explicit null" — here it's absent entirely, which is missing). So clarify.

Also need to check reference? Order: gross_pay missing first. So decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7.
Tool
{
  "reference": "second-half",
  "months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
  "rate": "0.08",
  "cap": "3500.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1100.00",
  "upper": "3000.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.14",
  "upper_rate": "0.24"
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-09 has no gross_pay value (missing required input). Please supply gross_pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record lacks gross_pay. Per R7 order, missing gross_pay takes priority — clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. No monetary fields.