← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 28
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 28 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 13.6s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5907abef11c974cf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5907abef11c974cf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, which is required to select the applicable reference row. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026 so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay "1930.34" and allowed_deduction "228.05", but no payroll_month. Wait — the task says "Process this monthly payroll record". payroll_month is missing. Per R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay? No, gross_pay present. 2. Missing payroll_month? Yes — explicit missing. Return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but is payroll_month truly missing? The record contains gross_pay and allowed_deduction only. The prompt says "Do not include input-only fields such as payroll_month..." but that's about output. R7: "Missing required values include explicit null." Here payroll_month is absent entirely — that's missing. Order: gross_pay checked first (present), then payroll_month (missing) → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Even though allowed_deduction is present and would need validation against a cap, the order of checks says missing payroll_month comes first (check 2 before check 3). So return clarify with reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses ["R1","R7"].
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 11.3s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "5907abef11c974cf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5907abef11c974cf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record is missing the required payroll_month (YYYY-MM), so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month for this record."
}
Reasoning
The record is missing payroll_month. Per R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay? No, gross_pay present. 2. Missing payroll_month? Yes → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait — but perhaps there are other documents? Only one document. payroll_month is required and missing (absent). Explicit absence counts. So clarify with reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Clause references: R1 and R7. Include short explanation naming unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 14.2s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let's start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "5907abef11c974cf-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5907abef11c974cf-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "1930.34", "allowed_deduction": "228.05"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record omits payroll_month (a required input under R1), so no reference row can be selected and payroll cannot be calculated. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay → no. 2. Missing payroll_month → yes, MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Cite R1 and R7. Wait, but should I check documents more? Only one document. The payroll_month is missing (explicitly absent, not even present as null — but missing includes explicit null). So clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Check R7 order: gross_pay present (1930.34), payroll_month missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Do not return calculated monetary fields.