Luma Payroll Gym
← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 41
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 41 (Traps, missing gross pay) Mean 100.0%
Field Expected Rollout #1 (100%) Rollout #2 (100%) Rollout #3 (100%)
decision clarify clarify clarify clarify
reason code MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY
clauses R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.2s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
  {"id": "b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll")
Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "8.69"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-10 has no gross_pay value. Please supply the gross pay amount so payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-10 and allowed_deduction 8.69, but no gross_pay. Gross pay is missing (explicitly absent). Per R7 rule 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.

Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 9.3s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
  {"id": "b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll")
Reasoning
Read it.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "8.69"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-10 omits the required gross_pay (an absent required value counts as missing), so no payslip can be calculated. Please supply gross_pay to proceed."
}
Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-10 and allowed_deduction 8.69, but no gross_pay. Per R7 order: missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, cite R1 and R7.

But wait — payroll month 2026-10 is second-half; but the check order says missing gross_pay first. Missing gross_pay includes explicit null / absent. So clarify.

Should I still lookup reference? Not necessary. The answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7. No monetary fields.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 10.4s · $0.0005
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
  {"id": "b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="b0ac331efc1923b1-payroll")
Reasoning
Read it.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-10", "allowed_deduction": "8.69"}
}
Assistant
calculate(program="gross_missing = 1.00")
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-10 and allowed_deduction 8.69, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Check order: missing gross_pay first.
Tool
{
  "results": {"gross_missing": "1.00"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record has no gross_pay value (a required input under R1). Please supply the monthly gross pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
No gross_pay present (explicit missing). Per R7 item 1: return clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Do not return calculated monetary fields.