← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 45
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 45 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "f46dc79c607d7411-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="f46dc79c607d7411-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. R7 step 2: missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But wait, maybe payroll_month is in the task prompt? The prompt says "Process this monthly payroll record" but doesn't give a month. The record lacks payroll_month. Per R7 order: gross_pay present, payroll_month missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Hmm, but maybe there are other documents? Only one document. So clarification.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.2s · $0.0003
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "f46dc79c607d7411-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="f46dc79c607d7411-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, which is required to select the applicable reference row. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. R7 order: 1. missing gross_pay? No. 2. Missing payroll_month? Yes -> clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait, but maybe payroll_month is elsewhere in the document? The record only contains these fields. So decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 13.5s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "f46dc79c607d7411-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="f46dc79c607d7411-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "6072.36", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month (YYYY-MM), so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month for this record."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. Wait — payroll_month is required. Let me check: the record shows gross_pay: "6072.36", allowed_deduction: "307.83". There's no payroll_month. Per R7, missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. But wait, check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. Gross pay is present. 2. Missing payroll_month → clarify. Hmm, but maybe payroll_month is supplied elsewhere? The task said "Process this monthly payroll record". The record only has those two fields. No payroll_month. So clarification MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But also allowed_deduction needs a row for cap... R4 says when month or applicable row is absent, accept structurally valid deductions but don't calculate. Anyway, we clarify. Check: gross_pay present, so first check passes. payroll_month missing (explicit null or absent). Return clarify with reason MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7. Also note gross_pay is valid money. But since we're clarifying, no monetary fields.