Luma Payroll Gym
Rules Report
← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 46
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 46 (Traps, missing gross pay) Mean 100.0%
Field Expected Rollout #1 (100%) Rollout #2 (100%) Rollout #3 (100%)
decision clarify clarify clarify clarify
reason code MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY MISSING_GROSS_PAY
clauses R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7 R1 R7
Prompt 
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.5s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning 
Let me list documents.
Tool
[
  {"id": "5d0252eecded84f4-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5d0252eecded84f4-payroll")
Reasoning 
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-05", "allowed_deduction": "233.79"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-05 contains no gross_pay value. Please supply the required gross_pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning 
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-05 and allowed_deduction 233.79, but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.

Wait, check order: gross_pay missing is first check. Yes, gross_pay is absent (missing includes explicit null; here it's absent entirely). Return clarify.

Do not return monetary fields.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.2s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning 
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
  {"id": "5d0252eecded84f4-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5d0252eecded84f4-payroll")
Reasoning 
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-05", "allowed_deduction": "233.79"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-05 has no gross_pay, which is a required value. Please provide the gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning 
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-05" and allowed_deduction "233.79", but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. So return clarify.

Gross pay is missing (explicitly absent). R7: "Missing required values include explicit null." Here it's absent entirely - missing gross_pay. So clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 11.2s · $0.0004
ComponentScoreClauses
decision 100.0% R1 R7
exact 100.0% R1 R7
field accuracy 100.0% R1 R7
citations 100.0% R1 R7
explanation 100.0% R1 R7
Assistant
list_documents()
Reasoning 
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
  {"id": "5d0252eecded84f4-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="5d0252eecded84f4-payroll")
Reasoning 
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-05", "allowed_deduction": "233.79"}
}
Assistant
{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-05 is missing the required gross_pay value. Please supply gross_pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning 
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-05 and allowed_deduction 233.79, but no gross_pay. Per R7 item 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, cite R1 and R7.

Wait, but maybe there are more documents? Only one document. The record has no gross_pay field. Missing required values include explicit null. Here gross_pay is absent entirely - that's missing. So clarify.

But wait - should I check for contract_gross_pay conflict? The order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. So MISSING_GROSS_PAY takes precedence.

Do I need lookup_reference? Not for the clarification with missing gross_pay (check order: gross_pay missing comes first). Return clarify with reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R1, R7, and a short explanation.

No monetary fields. Explanation naming the blocker and asking for resolution.