Task 48 · MiMo V2.6 Pro

← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 48

MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 48 (Traps, missing gross pay) Mean 100.0%

Field	Expected	Rollout #1 (100%)	Rollout #2 (100%)	Rollout #3 (100%)
decision	clarify	clarify	clarify	clarify
reason code	MISSING_GROSS_PAY	MISSING_GROSS_PAY	MISSING_GROSS_PAY	MISSING_GROSS_PAY
clauses	R1 R7	R1 R7	R1 R7	R1 R7

Prompt

Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.

Rollouts

Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 6.6s · $0.0004

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R1 R7
exact	100.0%	R1 R7
field accuracy	100.0%	R1 R7
citations	100.0%	R1 R7
explanation	100.0%	R1 R7

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me list documents first.

Tool

[
  {"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")

Reasoning

Read the payroll document.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-09 has no gross_pay value, which is required before any payroll can be calculated. Please supply the gross_pay amount for this month."
}

Reasoning

The payroll record only has payroll_month: "2026-09". gross_pay is missing (or absent). Per R7 rule 1: Missing gross_pay -> clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.

Note: "Missing required values include explicit null." Here gross_pay is absent entirely. That's missing. So clarify.

Check order: gross_pay missing first. Yes.

Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 7.2s · $0.0005

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R1 R7
exact	100.0%	R1 R7
field accuracy	100.0%	R1 R7
citations	100.0%	R1 R7
explanation	100.0%	R1 R7

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me start by listing documents.

Tool

[
  {"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")

Reasoning

Read the payroll document and both reference rows.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}

Tool

{
  "reference": "first-half",
  "months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
  "rate": "0.07",
  "cap": "3500.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1100.00",
  "upper": "3000.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.12",
  "upper_rate": "0.20"
}

Tool

{
  "reference": "second-half",
  "months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
  "rate": "0.04",
  "cap": "4500.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1200.00",
  "upper": "3300.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.12",
  "upper_rate": "0.24"
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-09 has no gross_pay value (required by R1). Please provide the monthly gross pay so the payroll can be calculated."
}

Reasoning

The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-09" but gross_pay is missing (explicitly absent, not even null). Per R7 item 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7.

Check order: gross_pay missing first. Yes.

Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.6s · $0.0004

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R1 R7
exact	100.0%	R1 R7
field accuracy	100.0%	R1 R7
citations	100.0%	R1 R7
explanation	100.0%	R1 R7

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me list documents first.

Tool

[
  {"id": "5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="5e2ce3610eaf2eaa-payroll")

Reasoning

Read the document.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"payroll_month": "2026-09"}
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-09 has no gross_pay value. Please supply the required gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}

Reasoning

The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-09 but no gross_pay (missing entirely). Per R7 item 1: missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, cite R1 and R7. Check order: gross_pay first. Yes.

Do we need reference lookup? Not necessary; the first check fails. But the month 2026-09 is within 2026 (second-half). Still, missing gross_pay takes precedence in order.