← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 54
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 54 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 10.2s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "341.21"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 does not include gross_pay, which is required by R1. Please supply the gross pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-01 and allowed_deduction 341.21, but gross_pay is missing (or perhaps absent). Wait — "Missing required values include explicit null." Here gross_pay is simply absent. Either way, missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, cite R1 and R7. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. Yes. Should I look up reference? Not necessary, since clarification check order puts missing gross_pay first. But it doesn't hurt. The answer: decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1","R7"], explanation naming blocker.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 12.2s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "341.21"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record omits required gross_pay, so the monthly payroll cannot be calculated. Please supply gross_pay for 2026-01."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-01" and allowed_deduction "341.21", but no gross_pay. Missing gross_pay → clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Explicit missing (omitted counts as missing; R7 says missing required values include explicit null). Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. So decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Should I check the reference row? No — clarification order puts missing gross_pay first. But let me maybe still lookup reference to confirm deduction cap? Not needed; answer is clarify. But allowed_deduction 341.21 — R4 says when month or row absent, but here gross pay missing so no calculation. Answer fields: decision, reason_code, clauses. No monetary fields.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 9.8s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="8ad5ac011f1341dc-payroll")Reasoning
Read it.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "341.21"}
}
Assistant
lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
The record has payroll_month 2026-01 but no gross_pay. R7.1: missing gross_pay -> clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY.
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.04",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1000.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.10",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.08",
"cap": "4000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3000.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 omits gross_pay, a required value. Please supply the gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
Gross pay is missing. Per R7 order, check 1: missing gross_pay -> clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Do not return monetary fields.