← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 57
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 57 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 9.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record is missing the required payroll_month (YYYY-MM). Please supply the payroll month so the correct reference row can be selected."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay 3362.67 and allowed_deduction 72.10. There's no payroll_month! Required: gross_pay and payroll_month. Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Wait, maybe there are more documents? Only one document. The record lacks payroll_month. Per R7 order: check missing gross_pay first (gross_pay present), then missing payroll_month (absent) → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. No monetary fields. Clauses: R1, R7.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 10.3s · $0.0006
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll")Reasoning
Read the document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record omits payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected; please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Per R7 order: 1. gross_pay present. 2. payroll_month missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait, but R4 says "When the month or applicable row is absent, accept structurally valid deductions up to the largest reference deduction cap for task validation, but do not calculate a payslip or assume a reference row." But R7 check order: missing payroll_month takes precedence (step 2 before step 3). So return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. No monetary fields. Clauses: R1, R7.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 12.3s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1da1cc4780ca4865-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3362.67", "allowed_deduction": "72.10"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay but has no payroll_month (a required field under R1). Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026 so the correct reference row can be selected."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay 3362.67 and allowed_deduction 72.10. But no payroll_month! Check R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay - present. 2. Missing payroll_month - it's missing (absent). Return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Wait, but maybe payroll_month is in another document? There's only one document. The record lacks payroll_month. Required field missing → clarify. But careful: R7 says "Missing required values include explicit null." Here payroll_month is absent entirely. So clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Also note gross_pay present. Decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7.