← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 83
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 83 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 29.6s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll")Reasoning
Read the document and lookup reference rows. I don't know the month yet, so read first.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record has no payroll_month, so the reference row cannot be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
No payroll_month. Also no contract_gross_pay. Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7. But check order: gross_pay is present, so first check passes. Second check: payroll_month missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Wait, the record has gross_pay but no payroll_month. Per R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay — not missing. 2. Missing payroll_month — missing (explicit null? It's absent, which includes missing). Return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 3 tool calls · 28.4s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Read it.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "3500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.08",
"upper_rate": "0.18"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record does not supply payroll_month (a required field), so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
Payroll month is missing. The record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. R7 order: missing gross_pay first, then missing payroll_month. So clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH citing R1 and R7.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 25.5s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="4b62047c2fc0a2f2-payroll")Reasoning
Read it.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3229.23", "allowed_deduction": "40.33"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record has no payroll_month, so the required reference row cannot be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
No payroll_month. Per R7 order: missing gross_pay first (present), missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. But should I look up reference? No, missing payroll_month takes precedence (order 2 before 3).