← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 88
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 88 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 15.8s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "2924.24", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record lacks the required payroll_month (YYYY-MM), so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay? No. 2. Missing payroll_month? Yes → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait, but maybe the payroll month is in another document? Only one document. So payroll_month is missing. Return clarify with reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 13.2s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "2924.24", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record has no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Wait — payroll_month is required. It's missing. Per R7 check order:
1. Missing gross_pay? No, gross_pay = 2924.24.
2. Missing payroll_month? Yes — return clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7.
But wait, maybe there's more documents? list_documents returned only one. Also maybe the record includes payroll_month elsewhere? No. The task says "Process this monthly payroll record". The record lacks payroll_month. Per R7 item 2: Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7.
"Missing required values include explicit null." Here it's absent, which is missing.
Do not return calculated monetary fields. So the answer:
{"decision":"clarify","reason_code":"MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH","clauses":["R1","R7"]}
Explanation: short, naming unresolved blocker and asking for resolution.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 14.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="53bdb78b6184cd21-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "2924.24", "allowed_deduction": "307.83"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay but no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (within 2026) to resolve this."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay "2924.24" and allowed_deduction "307.83". No payroll_month! Wait, R1 requires payroll_month. The record lacks payroll_month. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify. 2. Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Is payroll_month missing? The document only shows gross_pay and allowed_deduction. Yes, payroll_month is missing. But wait - maybe there are other documents? Only one document. So we clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Hmm, but should I still call lookup_reference? No - the clarification order: gross_pay present, payroll_month missing → clarify. We return decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses ["R1","R7"], and a short explanation naming the unresolved blocker and asking for resolution. No monetary fields.