← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 91
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 91 (Traps, missing gross pay)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY | MISSING_GROSS_PAY |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 9.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "44e5384a73d3496e-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="44e5384a73d3496e-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "101.23"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 omits the required gross_pay value; please provide the gross_pay amount so payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month "2026-01" and allowed_deduction "101.23", but gross_pay is missing (absent entirely). Per R7 rule 1: missing gross_pay → clarify with MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. Check order: 1. Missing gross_pay first. Yes. So clarify. Return JSON with decision clarify, reason_code MISSING_GROSS_PAY, clauses ["R1","R7"], and explanation.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.9s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "44e5384a73d3496e-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="44e5384a73d3496e-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "101.23"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record for 2026-01 does not provide gross_pay, which is required under R1; please supply the gross_pay amount so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has payroll_month 2026-01 and allowed_deduction 101.23, but gross_pay is missing (or absent). Per R7 rule 1: Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY, citing R1 and R7. The record doesn't include gross_pay at all. "Missing required values include explicit null." Here it's absent entirely, which is missing. So return clarify. No need to lookup reference. But order: check1. missing gross_pay first. Yes. Answer JSON: decision: "clarify", reason_code: "MISSING_GROSS_PAY", clauses: ["R1","R7"], explanation naming blocker.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 9.1s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "44e5384a73d3496e-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="44e5384a73d3496e-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"payroll_month": "2026-01", "allowed_deduction": "101.23"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_GROSS_PAY",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record is missing the required gross_pay value (explicitly absent). Please supply the employee's gross pay for payroll month 2026-01 so the payroll can be calculated."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record lacks gross_pay (missing required). It has payroll_month 2026-01 and allowed_deduction 101.23. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY citing R1 and R7. Order of checks: 1. Missing gross_pay → clarify MISSING_GROSS_PAY. Explicitly missing counts. So return clarify. No monetary fields. Clauses: R1, R7. Explanation: name unresolved blocker and ask for resolution.