Task 94 · MiMo V2.6 Pro

← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 94

MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 94 (Traps, conflicting pay (amount mismatch)) Mean 100.0%

Field	Expected	Rollout #1 (100%)	Rollout #2 (100%)	Rollout #3 (100%)
decision	clarify	clarify	clarify	clarify
reason code	CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY	CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY	CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY	CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY
clauses	R7 R9	R7 R9	R7 R9	R7 R9

Prompt

Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.

Rollouts

Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 5 tool calls · 12.5s · $0.0009

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R7 R9
exact	100.0%	R7 R9
field accuracy	100.0%	R7 R9
citations	100.0%	R7 R9
explanation	100.0%	R7 R9

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me start by listing documents.

Tool

[
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-payroll", "kind": "payroll"},
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-contract", "kind": "contract"},
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-amendment", "kind": "amendment"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-payroll")read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-contract")read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-amendment")

Reasoning

Let me read all three documents.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"gross_pay": "4188.34", "payroll_month": "2026-04", "allowed_deduction": "161.97"}
}

Tool

{
  "kind": "contract",
  "gross_pay": "4163.34"
}

Tool

{
  "kind": "amendment",
  "gross_pay": "4218.34",
  "effective_month": "2026-02",
  "approved": true
}

Assistant

lookup_reference(reference="first-half")

Reasoning

Payroll month 2026-04 → first half (Jan–Jun). Contract gross pay 4163.34 differs from gross_pay 4188.34 → conflict. Amendment: approved, effective 2026-02 ≤ 2026-04, but amount 4218.34 ≠ 4188.34 → does not resolve conflict. So CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY under R7 and R9.

Wait — but order of checks: R7 items 1-3 first. gross_pay present, payroll_month present, month has reference. Item 4: conflict unresolved → clarify CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, cite R7 and R9. No monetary fields.

Tool

{
  "reference": "first-half",
  "months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
  "rate": "0.05",
  "cap": "4500.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1100.00",
  "upper": "3300.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.12",
  "upper_rate": "0.24"
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
  "explanation": "The contract gross pay (4163.34) differs from the payroll gross pay (4188.34), and the approved amendment effective 2026-02 states 4218.34, which does not equal the payroll record's gross pay, so it does not resolve the conflict. Please resolve the gross pay discrepancy (e.g., by supplying a conforming amendment or corrected figures)."
}

Reasoning

Reference row exists for 2026-04. But the contract conflict is unresolved (amendment amount 4218.34 ≠ 4188.34). Per R7 item 4 → clarify with CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, cite R7 and R9. Do not return monetary fields.

Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 5 tool calls · 19.9s · $0.0011

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R7 R9
exact	100.0%	R7 R9
field accuracy	100.0%	R7 R9
citations	100.0%	R7 R9
explanation	100.0%	R7 R9

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me start by listing documents.

Tool

[
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-payroll", "kind": "payroll"},
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-contract", "kind": "contract"},
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-amendment", "kind": "amendment"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-payroll")read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-contract")read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-amendment")

Reasoning

Read all three documents.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"gross_pay": "4188.34", "payroll_month": "2026-04", "allowed_deduction": "161.97"}
}

Tool

{
  "kind": "contract",
  "gross_pay": "4163.34"
}

Tool

{
  "kind": "amendment",
  "gross_pay": "4218.34",
  "effective_month": "2026-02",
  "approved": true
}

Assistant

lookup_reference(reference="first-half")

Reasoning

Payroll: gross_pay 4188.34, month 2026-04, allowed_deduction 161.97. Contract: 4163.34, differs from gross_pay → conflict unless amendment resolves it. Amendment: gross_pay 4218.34, effective_month 2026-02, approved true. But amendment amount 4218.34 ≠ payroll gross 4188.34 → does not resolve conflict. So CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY per R7 and R9.

Wait — order of checks: 1 missing gross, 2 missing month, 3 no reference row, 4 contract conflict. Should I check reference row first? Month 2026-04 is within 2026 and covered by rows (first-half covers 01-06 presumably). But check order says step 3 before step 4. To cite properly, I should verify reference exists. Let me lookup first-half to confirm April is covered. Actually the row selection uses payroll month; the reference rows presumably cover months. Let me check lookup_reference first-half to confirm coverage, though the answer is conflict anyway. But rule order demands checking step 3 before4. Let me do the lookup.

Also R7 says: "For these cases do not return calculated monetary fields." So clarify with CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R7 and R9.

Let me still lookup reference to be thorough.

Tool

{
  "reference": "first-half",
  "months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
  "rate": "0.05",
  "cap": "4500.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1100.00",
  "upper": "3300.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.12",
  "upper_rate": "0.24"
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
  "explanation": "The contract gross_pay 4163.34 differs from the payroll gross_pay 4188.34, and the approved amendment (gross_pay 4218.34, effective 2026-02) does not resolve the conflict because its amount does not equal the payroll record's gross_pay. Please provide an approved amendment matching the payroll gross_pay or a corrected payroll/contract value."
}

Reasoning

Month 2026-04 is covered by first-half row (2026-01 through 2026-06). So step 3 passes. Step 4: contract gross_pay 4163.34 ≠ payroll gross_pay 4188.34 → conflict. Amendment: approved, effective 2026-02 ≤ 2026-04, but amount 4218.34 ≠ 4188.34 → does not resolve. So clarify, CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, clauses R7, R9.

Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 11.7s · $0.0006

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R7 R9
exact	100.0%	R7 R9
field accuracy	100.0%	R7 R9
citations	100.0%	R7 R9
explanation	100.0%	R7 R9

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me list documents first.

Tool

[
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-payroll", "kind": "payroll"},
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-contract", "kind": "contract"},
  {"id": "a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-amendment", "kind": "amendment"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-payroll")read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-contract")read_document(document_id="a63f2e3ab9c6eb39-amendment")

Reasoning

Read all three documents.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"gross_pay": "4188.34", "payroll_month": "2026-04", "allowed_deduction": "161.97"}
}

Tool

{
  "kind": "contract",
  "gross_pay": "4163.34"
}

Tool

{
  "kind": "amendment",
  "gross_pay": "4218.34",
  "effective_month": "2026-02",
  "approved": true
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY",
  "clauses": ["R7", "R9"],
  "explanation": "The payroll gross pay 4188.34 and contract gross pay 4163.34 differ, and the approved amendment (4218.34, effective 2026-02) does not equal the payroll gross pay, so it cannot resolve the conflict. Please confirm the correct gross pay or provide a resolving amendment."
}

Reasoning

Payroll gross4188.34, contract 4163.34 → conflict. Amendment approved, effective 2026-02 ≤ 2026-04, but amount 4218.34 ≠ 4188.34 → does not resolve. So CONFLICTING_GROSS_PAY, cite R7 and R9.

Wait — should I check order? gross_pay present, payroll_month present, reference exists for 2026-04. Then conflict check: conflicting and not resolved → clarify. No monetary fields.