← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 100
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 100 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 7.4s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1fabc2eef64bc4c8-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1fabc2eef64bc4c8-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3432.38", "allowed_deduction": "79.13"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides gross_pay but no payroll_month, so the reference row cannot be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction, but no payroll_month. Per R7 order: missing gross_pay check first (gross_pay present), then missing payroll_month — payroll_month is missing. So clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Wait, the document doesn't include payroll_month. Required fields: gross_pay and payroll_month. Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 8.3s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1fabc2eef64bc4c8-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1fabc2eef64bc4c8-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3432.38", "allowed_deduction": "79.13"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month, which is required to select the applicable reference row. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay but no payroll_month. Wait — is payroll_month missing? The record shows gross_pay and allowed_deduction only. So payroll_month is missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH (check order: gross_pay first, then payroll_month). Gross_pay present, payroll_month missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait, but perhaps payroll_month is elsewhere? Only one document. The record has no payroll_month. So return clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 12.7s · $0.0006
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "1fabc2eef64bc4c8-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="1fabc2eef64bc4c8-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "3432.38", "allowed_deduction": "79.13"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides gross_pay but the required payroll_month (YYYY-MM) is missing, so no reference row can be selected. Please supply the payroll month."
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay "3432.38" and allowed_deduction "79.13" — but no payroll_month! Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Wait, order of checks: gross_pay present (3432.38), payroll_month missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. However, the task says "Process this monthly payroll record" — the payroll_month might be provided elsewhere? The input fields like payroll_month aren't in the document. Let me check — the record only contains gross_pay and allowed_deduction. There's no payroll_month. But wait, the prompt says "Do not include input-only fields such as payroll_month" — suggesting payroll_month might be an input. But it's not in the record. Hmm. Maybe there's only one document. The record lacks payroll_month. Per R7 check 2: Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Actually wait — maybe the lookup_reference gives effective months and the payroll month could be inferred? No — R1 says select reference row using payroll month. Never guess. Missing payroll_month is explicit clarification. But hold on: could payroll_month be a top-level task field that wasn't in the document? The task says "Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document." So all inputs come from documents. The document record lacks payroll_month. So clarification. But careful: R7 says "Missing required values include explicit null." Here it's absent. Still missing. Return clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Clauses: R1 and R7.